|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2017-01-23-CONCOM-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Conservation Commission-ConCom
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
2017-01-23-CONCOM-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2019 1:14:36 PM
Creation date
5/2/2017 3:29:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - CONCOM - Conservation Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />TOWN OF LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS <br />CONSERVATION COMMISSION <br />MINUTES <br />Monday, January 23, 2017 <br /> 6:30 P.M. <br />Hudson Room, Cary Hall <br />1605 Massachusetts Ave <br />Chair Philip Hamilton opened the meeting at 6:39pm in the Hudson Room of the Cary Hall <br />Building. <br />Commissioners Present: Phil Hamilton, Duke Bitsko, Alex Dohan, Kevin Beuttell, Dick Wolk, <br />David Langseth <br />Others present: Karen Mullins, Conservation Administrator and Jennifer Gingras, Department <br />Assistant <br />6:39pm <br />Follow up discussion, Maguire and Hartwell Ave Intersection and Bridge Improvements, Town <br />Engineering <br />Mr. Beuttell abstained from the informal hearing. <br />Dave Cannon- Lexington Engineering Department, Simon Hilt and Tom Hanson- Stantec <br />Engineering <br />Mr. Cannon explained that they had presented the options of the roadway reconstruction to the <br />Board of Selectmen, who had expressed a preference for a roundabout. The Board of Selectmen <br />asked that they go back before the Conservation Commission to propose both options and get a <br />better understanding of their opinion. <br />Mr. Hilt showed the commissioners the two options that they are considering. The signalized <br />intersection option would have the same lanes but would result in a smaller footprint. Mr. Hilt <br />presented a chart comparing the different options and listing the square footage impact. <br />Questions and comments from the Commission: <br />The Commission stated that from a wetland perspective, the best option is the one with the <br />smallest impact – signalized intersection with the walls; however, that doesn’t take the cost into <br />consideration. The applicant presented a cost comparison for the different options. <br />The Commission stated that the more disturbance, the more replication that is required under the <br />by-law. It would not be possible to replicate the disturbance from either roundabout option. <br />Mr. Hilt stated that in the Southeast quadrant, there is approximately 8,000 sq. ft. available for <br />replication. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.