Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br /> MEETING OF MAY 12, 1999 <br /> The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in the Selectmen's Room Town Office Building, was <br /> called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Merrill with members Galaitsis, Bridge-Denzak, Planning Director <br /> Bowyer, and Assistant Planner Garber present. Mr Colman and Mr. Davies were absent. <br /> *************************************MINUTES *************************************** <br /> 83 Review of Minutes: The Board reviewed the minutes for the meetings of January 13 and January 20, <br /> and May 5, 1999 On the motion of Mr Galaitsis, seconded by Ms. Bridge-Denzak, it was voted unanimously <br /> 3-0 to approve the minutes, as written. The Board reviewed and corrected the minutes for the meeting of <br /> February 10, 1999 On the motion of Mr Galaitsis, seconded by Ms. Bridge-Denzak, it was voted unani- <br /> mously 3-0 to approve the minutes,as amended. <br /> ************ ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ************* <br /> SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br /> 84 246 Concord Avenue.Issaians/Markarians,Definitive 7 4.5 Subdivision Plan: Public Hearing: Mr. <br /> Merrill opened the hearing at 7.46.Present for this item were Attorney John Farrington,Ronald Wood, <br /> landscape architect,and Frederick Russell,P.E. There were 6 people in the audience.Mr Farrington presented <br /> a definitive reduced frontage,two-lot subdivision plan under Section 7 4.5 of the Zoning By-Law for land at <br /> 246 Concord Avenue. A conventional subdivision plan, called Valod's Way,was approved for the site in 1992 <br /> was never built and the approval expired after two years. <br /> The plan shows two house lots sharing a common driveway In lieu of road construction,the applicant <br /> proposes,as a public benefit,to donate a sum toward a neighborhood tot lot on the Blossom Street meadow <br /> No other waivers are requested. Mr Farrington pointed out features of the plan that respond to Planning <br /> Board's recommendations made at the sketch plan stage. He said that more precise details on the house size, <br /> landscaping,construction plans with a limit of work line, etc. could be made a condition of the special permit, <br /> without which a building permit would not be issued. The buyer of the lot would do that.Mr Russell <br /> explained that more work needs to be done on the drainage system. <br /> Questions from the audience had to do with the size of the proposed dwelling, site coverage and the adjoining <br /> conservation land. In response to a question by Karen Dawson,212 Concord Avenue,Mr Merrill explained <br /> that section 7 4.5 gives the Board latitude to control the size and quality of the development.Further <br /> discussion concerned the complications caused by the lack of specifics on the proposed house. Various ways <br /> of making sure the house is acceptable were brought up. <br /> As only three Planning Board members were present, and at least four are required for a decision on a <br /> subdivision,the Board agreed to continue the public hearing on Wednesday, June 2. <br /> DETERMINATION OF GRADE AND CONSTRUCTION OF UNACCEPTED STREETS <br /> 85 10 Richard Road. Taylor.Preliminary Street Improvement Plan: Present for this item were Attorney <br /> Matthew Conroy, Christopher Emilius,P.E., of GEOD Consulting, Inc., and Daniel Taylor,the applicant. <br /> There were 6 people in the audience. <br /> Mr. Emilius showed a full compliance street improvement plan for the portion of Richard Road that provides <br /> frontage for number 10,as well as the improvement plan they would like to build,with specified design <br /> waivers. The proposed roadway would connect with the accepted portion of Richard Road and transition to the <br /> remaining unaccepted portion. It will be engineered to minimize the amount of drainage onto existing <br /> driveways off Richard Road. Waivers from landscaping and width requirements will allow the new roadway <br /> to impact the existing properties as little as possible. <br />