Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br /> MEETING OF MAY 23, 1994 <br /> The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in Room G-15, Town Office <br /> Building, was called to order at 7 42 p m. by Chairman Domnitz, with members <br /> Canale, Davison, Grant, Merrill, Planning Director Bowyer, and Assistant Planner <br /> Marino present <br /> ************************ PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT *********************** <br /> 107. Staff Reports <br /> a. 258 East Street. Sketch Preliminary Subdivision Plan. Rollout Mr. Marino <br /> rolled out a sketch preliminary plan for the 258 East Street development that was <br /> submitted by Zaroohy Seed on May 20, 1994. The staff has not reviewed the plan in <br /> detail yet. The time for action on this plan expires on June 19, 1994 <br /> b. 10 Summer Street, Definitive Plan Mr. Marino rolled out a definitive plan <br /> for the 10 Summer Street development that was submitted by Barbara Zack on May 17, <br /> 1994. The time for action on this plan expires on August 15, 1994 <br /> ************************ REGIONAL, INTERTOWN ISSUES ************************* <br /> 108. Met State Hospital Reuse The Board continued its review of the objectives <br /> criteria, guidelines and assumptions for the development of the Met. State <br /> Hospital land by working on the questionnaire dated April 6, 1994. <br /> Mrs Davison expressed a concern about a concentration of housing for the elderly <br /> She she hoped it would not become an elderly "ghetto." She advocated more family <br /> type housing. Three members, Mr. Canale, Mrs. Davison and Mr. Merrill agreed <br /> there should be a greater balance in the orientation of the housing units to <br /> different age groups <br /> Mr. Canale inquired whether the housing subcommittee of the Tri-Community Task <br /> Force had expressed any preference for ownership or rental housing as it would <br /> affect the number of housing units that could be counted toward the subsidized <br /> housing inventory for Chapter 774 compliance Mr. Marino responded that the <br /> question had never been discussed. <br /> Mr. Canale suggested, and other Board members agreed, that preference should be <br /> given to those housing units which would provide greatest credit for Lexington in <br /> the EOCD subsidized housing inventory for compliance with Chapter 774, the Anti- <br /> Snob Zoning Act <br /> Mr Domnitz said his primary interests are the impact of development on traffic <br /> patterns on Lexington streets, and achieving a neutral or positive fiscal impact <br /> for the Town, i.e , greater tax revenue than costs for services provided by the <br /> Town. Mr Grant agreed with those interests. <br /> Mr. Domnitz proposed that, instead of working through a lengthy questionnaire, <br /> that a subcommittee be created to review the Met. State issue and draft a state- <br /> ment Mr. Canale and Mr. Merrill agreed to serve with Mr Domnitz on the subcom- <br /> mittee <br /> l i <br />