Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br /> MEETING OF FEBRUARY 14, 1994 <br /> The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in Room G-15, Town Office Building, <br /> was called to order at 7 41 p.m. by Chairman Domnitz, with members Canale, Davison, <br /> Grant, Planning Director Bowyer, and Assistant Planner Marino present Mr. Williams <br /> was absent. <br /> *********************** ARTICLES FOR 1994 TOWN MEETING *********************** <br /> 32 Article 24, Jumbo Houses It was agreed that at both the public hearing and <br /> the Town Meeting Mrs. Davison will provide a general overview of the proposed <br /> amendment, with Mr Domnitz available as a technical backup It was agreed to <br /> revise the order of hearing to delete questions from other Board members when the <br /> Planning Board is the proponent of the amendment <br /> ************************* REGIONAL, INTERTOWN ISSUES ************************* <br /> 33 Met. State Hospital Land Task Force Mr. Marino presented information on <br /> population and housing characteristics in Belmont, Lexington and Waltham, drawn <br /> principally from the U S Census That information is part of a housing needs <br /> assessment being prepared for the Met State Hospital Land Task Force. <br /> ***************** ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ************ <br /> APPLICATIONS TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> 34. Land Use Regulations Mr. Domnitz reported on the Board of Appeals hearings <br /> held on February 10, 1994. One member, Mr. McWeeney, expressed reluctance to make <br /> an architectural judgement on a case involving the conversion of a one family <br /> dwelling into two dwelling units Other members of the Board of Appeals did not <br /> comment on the architectural treatment Section 5 3.2 of the Zoning By-Law requires <br /> that the Board of Appeals determine that "the "architectural character of a <br /> detached, one-family dwelling is maintained." Mrs. Davison advocated sending a <br /> letter to the Board of Appeals pointing out that provision and recommending the <br /> Board of Appeals consult with the Design Advisory Committee if it is reluctant to <br /> make architectural determinations Mr. Domnitz and other Planning Board members <br /> thought that it would be better if the chairman of the Planning Board had an <br /> informal discussion with the chairman of the Board of Appeals. <br /> Mr Grant left the meeting at this time <br /> ********************************** REPORTS ********************************** <br /> 35 Planning Board, Subcommittees <br /> a. SPAIAG Mr Bowyer distributed a "Report on the Community Conversations" <br /> which is a summary of eight meetings held in September and October by the Strategic <br /> Planning and Implementation Group (SPAIAG) . Mr. Domnitz reported that Chairman <br /> Dailey of the Selectmen had invited him to meet with members of the SPAIAG on <br /> Wednesday, February 16 at 7 00 p m. prior to the 7 30 meeting to present the <br /> findings of the SPAIAG. The earlier meeting is to formulate a questionnaire to be <br /> sent to a sample of Lexington residents to assist in determining what direction the <br /> community should go. Representatives from the Mercer Company, a professional <br />