Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br /> MEETING OF JUNE 7, 1993 <br /> IThe meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in Room G-15, Town Office <br /> l Building, was called to order at 7 41 p.m. by Chairman Williams, with members <br /> Canale, Davison, Domnitz, Planning Director Bowyer, and Assistant Planner <br /> Marino present. Mr. Grant was absent. <br /> ***************** ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ************ <br /> SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br /> 86 Lowell Street Subdivision On the motion of Mr. Canale, seconded by Mr. <br /> Domnitz, the Board voted unanimously to approve Woodhaven Realty's June 7, <br /> 1993 request for an extension of time to act on the Lowell Street (Emanon <br /> Lane) subdivision from June 9, 1993 to September 7, 1993. <br /> ************************* PLANNING BOARD REGULATIONS ************************* <br /> 87. Revision of Development Regulations The Board reviewed a draft, dated <br /> June 7, 1993, of Chapter One, General Provisions, of the Development Regula- <br /> tions. The Board edited the draft and completed its review <br /> ****************************** COMPREHENSIVE PLAN *************************** <br /> 88 Stens in Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Bowyer distributed notebooks contain- <br /> ing materials describing the preparation of a Comprehensive Plan. He de- <br /> scribed the elements of a master plan required by Ch. 41, Sect. 81D of the <br /> Massachusetts General Laws <br /> Mr. Williams inquired whether the Open Space and Recreation Plan prepared for <br /> the Conservation Commission and the Recreation Committee, was the same as the <br /> Open Space and Recreation element required by Section 81D. Mr. Bowyer <br /> explained that the Planting Board should anticipate collaborating with various <br /> Town boards, committees and departments, in preparing the elements of the <br /> Comprehensive Plan. For instance, the Board might work with the Transportation <br /> Advisory Committee on the Transportation Element, or with the Housing Authori- <br /> ty and LexHAB on the Housing Element. He suggested perhaps 95% of the <br /> material in the Open Space and Recreation plan may be included in the Open <br /> Space and Recreation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> But the Comprehensive Plan has to be more than a collection of program plans <br /> prepared by different boards, committees and departments. Section 81D <br /> requires that the Comprehensive Plan be internally consistent. For instance, <br /> advocates of housing, open space and recreation, economic development, schools <br /> and transportation might all propose a use for the same piece of land. Part <br /> of the Planning Board's responsibility is to reconcile competing interests so <br /> that the Plan is internally consistent. <br /> Several members asked whether the Town Meeting needs to adopt the Comprehen- <br /> sive Plan and whether a Comprehensive Plan is realistic. Mr. Bowyer explained <br /> that the Planning Board adoption is required; Town Meeting action is optional. <br /> Implementation of the Comprehensive Plan requires dozens of actions by Town <br /> Meeting over the years to adopt or amend regulations and to make appropria- <br />