Laserfiche WebLink
--Th PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br /> MEETING OF JUNE 5, 1989 <br /> The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in Room G-15, Town Office <br /> Building, was called to order at 7: 35 p.m. by the Chairman, Mrs. Uhrig, with <br /> members Klauminzer, Sorensen, Williams, Wood, Planning Director Bowyer, <br /> Assistant Planner Nordby and Secretary Peters present. <br /> **************** ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ************** <br /> SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br /> 147. Eaton Road, Definitive Subdivision Plan, Decision: The Board reviewed a <br /> draft decision, approving the definitive subdivision plan. On the motion of <br /> Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mrs. Klauminzer, it was voted 5-0 to approve the <br /> definitive subdivision plan and to approve the Certificate of Action, as <br /> written, with the letter, dated May 30, 1989, to Kevin Duffy, and the memo <br /> from the Engineering Department, dated May 22, 1989, attached. <br /> 148. Childs Road, Definitive Subdivision Plan, Decision: The Board reviewed <br /> a draft decision, approving the definitive subdivision plan. Mr. Sorensen <br /> believed the applicant should have requested a waiver from Section 6.5.1 of <br /> the Planning Board's Development Regulations or else bring the extension of <br /> Childs Road to the boundary of the two lots. The Board discussed how this <br /> section should be interpreted, and four members decided this should be <br /> interpreted to refer to land beyond the subdivision. <br /> On the motion of Mr. Williams, seconded by Mrs. Wood, it was voted 4-1 (Mr. <br /> Sorensen voted in the negative) to approve the definitive subdivision plan, <br /> and to approve the Certificate of Action, as written, with the addition of the <br /> letter, dated May 30, 1989, to Thomas Taylor attached. <br /> Mr. Sorensen asked that the record show that he believed this proposal is a <br /> sham, done only to keep their development options open and to decrease the <br /> apparent value of the land, and that the Planning Board should not have taken <br /> any part in it. <br /> 149. Ridge Estates II, East Emerson Road, Status Report: Mr. Bowyer reported <br /> that a letter has gone out to all affected abuttors outlining the steps the <br /> Town will be taking to complete the road work, in the right-of-way, bringing it <br /> up to Town standards, and to complete the remaining landscaping on the resi- <br /> dents' property needed to accomplish this. <br /> Ms. Nordby reported appointments are being made with affected residents to <br /> resolve differences between the residents, the Engineering Department and the <br /> developer. She added that the Engineering Department has set the stakes so <br /> that it will be easier for the abuttors to visualize what work will be neces- <br /> sary and how it will affect individual properties when she and a representa- <br /> tive from the Engineering Department meet with the owners. <br /> The Board commended Ms. Nordby on her extensive efforts to complete compli- <br /> cated negotiations that had to be done in order to finish the road work in a <br /> way that will bring the best results possible for all concerned. <br /> &g1 <br /> 1 <br />