PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
<br /> MEETING OF MAY 1, 1989
<br /> The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in Room G-15, Town Office
<br /> Building, was called to order by the Chairman, Mrs. Uhrig, with members
<br /> Klauminzer, Wood, Planning Director Bowyer, Assistant Planner Nordby and
<br /> Secretary Peters present. Mr. Sorensen arrived during Item 124, and Mr.
<br /> Williams was absent.
<br /> 124. Review of Minutes: The Board reviewed the minutes for the meeting of
<br /> February 27, 1989, making corrections. On the motion of Mrs. Wood, seconded
<br /> by Mrs. Klauminzer, it was voted 3-0 to approve the minutes, as amended.
<br /> The Board reviewed the minutes for the meetings of March 6 and 13, 1989,
<br /> making corrections. On the motion of Mrs. Klauminzer, seconded by Mrs. Wood,
<br /> it was voted 4-0 to approve the minutes for these meetings, as amended.
<br /> The Board reviewed the minutes for the meetings of March 20, 27, April 3, 5,
<br /> 10, and 12, 1989. On the motion of Mrs. Klauminzer, seconded by Mrs. Wood, it
<br /> was voted 4-0 to approve the minutes for these meetings, as written.
<br /> **************** ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ************
<br /> RECOMMENDATIONS ON APPLICATIONS TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS
<br /> ` 1
<br /> 125. Hearings scheduled for May 11, 1989: Mr. Sorensen gave an oral review
<br /> of the following hearings to be heard by the Board of Appeals on May 11, 1989:
<br /> 643 Waltham Street, James Catalano, renew SP, to continue the business
<br /> of selling flowers , produce and plants , as well as seasonal sale of
<br /> Christmas trees and wreaths. On the motion of Mr. Sorensen, seconded by
<br /> Mrs. Wood, it was voted 4-0 to recommend the special permit be renewed
<br /> for the same period of time, and with the same conditions as were most
<br /> recently imposed.
<br /> 10 Pleasant Street , Robert Berezin, appeal of the decision of the
<br /> Building Commissioner regarding possible zoning violations by Wilson
<br /> Farm. The Board agreed the case was very complicated. On the motion of
<br /> Mr. Sorensen, seconded by Mrs. Wood, it was voted 4-0 to recommend that
<br /> because of the complexity of the application, the hearing be continued
<br /> to provide an opportunity for each Planning Board member to read all the
<br /> material submitted.
<br /> The Planning Board also agreed to make no recommendation on the following
<br /> applications:
<br /> 20 Vaille Avenue, Richard and Mary Ann Beamon, SP, to raise the roof and
<br /> add front dormers to the non-conforming portion of a dwelling;
<br /> 7 Harrington Road, First Parish Church, SP, to modify a 25 foot transi-
<br /> tion area screening requirement to 18 feet for an addition at the rear
<br /> of the church;
<br />
|