Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes for the Meeting of September 11, 1991 2 <br /> and construction of unaccepted streets have now become almost the <br /> same as those required for subdivision streets. He added that the <br /> 1 Policy does enable the Board to exercise some flexibility, based on <br /> specific site conditions, in what can be required to bring unaccept- <br /> ed streets up to adequate grade and construction <br /> b. Determination of Grade and Construction for Lot 45 James Street <br /> Mr Marino reported that the applicant, Mr. Sundar Balasuryan, has <br /> asked that the provisions of the Policy on Grade and Construction of <br /> Unaccepted Streets be waived. Mrs Wood argued the Board should not <br /> grant this request, since it would confer special status on this lot <br /> and establish undesirable precedents affecting future determina- <br /> tions. <br /> Mr Williams questioned the legality of the Board's approving grade and <br /> construction standards for a portion of James Street that could cause <br /> surface water to drain onto private land. He asked that Town Counsel be <br /> asked to give an opinion on the property rights of the abuttors onto <br /> whose land surface water might run. <br /> Mrs. Davison questioned whether a public hearing will be held and how <br /> abutters will know of the proposed changes. Mr. Grant and Mrs. Wood <br /> responded that there is no provision in state law for a public hearing. <br /> Mr. Marino commented that there is no provision for appeal which is <br /> usually the practice after a public hearing. Mr. Williams asked that <br /> the staff communicate to the applicant to encourage him to explain the <br /> proposed construction to those affected. <br /> On the motion of Mrs Wood, seconded by Mr. Grant, it was voted 4-1-0 <br /> (Mr. Domnitz voted in the negative) <br /> 1. That the Planning Board does not grant the applicant's request for a <br /> blanket waiver from the requirements in the "Policy On Construction <br /> Standards for Unaccepted Streets". In the opinion of the Planning <br /> Board, James Street, insofar as it provides frontage for Lot 45, as <br /> shown on Map 87, is not now of adequate grade and construction; <br /> If the improvements identified on the "Plan and Profile of a Portion <br /> of James Street in Lexington, Mass. , " dated August 8, prepared by <br /> John P. Burney, Professional Engineer in the Commonwealth of Massa- <br /> chusetts are made <br /> 1) with minor changes which are approved by the Town Engineer, <br /> 2) with the addition of 3 street trees per the standard, and <br /> 3) are considered adequate upon inspection by the Town Engineer, <br /> then the portion of James Street to which the Planning Board re- <br /> quired improvements would be of adequate grade and construction; <br /> The work may proceed in 2 stages stage #1 shall consist of improve- <br /> ments between telephone pole #7 ( identified on the plan) toward the <br /> east; stage #2 shall consist of improvements from telephone pole #7 <br /> toward the west. The applicant shall have the option of providing <br /> surety for the completion of stage 2 only. Stage 1 must be fully <br /> completed. <br />