|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2016-06-27-CONCOM-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Conservation Commission-ConCom
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
2016-06-27-CONCOM-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2019 1:14:49 PM
Creation date
10/14/2016 9:18:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - CONCOM - Conservation Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />TOWN OF LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS <br />CONSERVATION COMMISSION <br />MINUTES <br />Monday June 27, 2016 <br /> 6:30 P.M. <br />Parker Room, Town Office Building <br />1625 Massachusetts Ave <br />Chair Phil Hamilton opened the meeting at 6:33 pm in the Parker Room of the Town Office <br />Building <br />Commissioners Present: Phil Hamilton, Joyce Miller, Alex Dohan, Kevin Beuttell <br />Others Present: Casey Hagerty, Conservation Department Assistant <br />6:33pm <br />Update on Enforcement Order: Bina Farm/John Carroll, 55/31 Allen Street <br />William Dailey, Rich Kirby, Frank Postma <br />Mr. Dailey explained that new materials have been submitted to the commission and they hope <br />to do the plantings this fall. <br />Mr. Hamilton entered the engineering report into the record. <br />Mr. Kirby went on to explain the changes he made in the plan. He stated that the drainage design <br />and O and M plan have been submitted to the commission. All dewatering activities will take <br />place outside of the Buffer zone and oak stakes will be used instead of live stakes. <br />Questions and comments from the commission: <br />The commission asked why the plans were not stamped. Mr. Potsma explained that the final <br />engineering plan will be stamped by the engineer. <br />The commission stated that they did not think a 1:1 wetland replication would be sufficient. They <br />were concerned about what would happen if there were problems with some of the plants. Mr. <br />Postma stated that the wetland restoration will be 1:1, but the replicated stormwater wetland will <br />make it a 2:1 ratio. The applicant explained that they could shift the replicated stormwater <br />wetland slightly to enlarge the wetland restoration area. <br />The commission requested that more detail be added to the plan including the edge of pavement <br />line, the retaining wall, and the infiltration trench dimensions and widths. <br />The commission asked for detail regarding the geo-grid. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.