Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br /> MEETING OF JUNE 10, 1996 <br /> The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in Room G-15, Town Office Building, was called to order <br /> at 7.39 p.m. by Chairman Davison, with members Canale, Colman, Davies, Planning Director Bowyer, and <br /> Assistant Planner Marino present. Mr Merrill was absent. <br /> **************************** COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING **************************** <br /> 117 Land Use Element, Site Analyses: <br /> Before beginning discussions about the three sites on the agenda, and for the benefit of Mr. Colman, the newest <br /> member of the Board, the Board reviewed the reasons for undertaking the site analyses and the process they are <br /> following to assess the undeveloped sites left in Lexington. Considered for each site are appropriate uses, where <br /> it fits into the overall land use picture, the Town's needs, and potential public benefits. As the sites are <br /> considered, the Planning Board's discussions help to formulate general attitudes toward development, or <br /> nondevelopment, that will create a framework on which to draft a comprehensive land use plan. <br /> a. Burlineton Street/Route 128. The Board agreed that if development does occur, cluster development is most <br /> desirable for the properties that make up this "site" While several lots were defined for the staff analysis, the <br /> Board's attitude could apply to any of the group of lots along Burlington Street that back up to Route 128. Low <br /> density residential development is preferred. Commercial development or more intensive residential <br /> development is not desirable because of the limited access through an established neighborhood. <br /> Cluster development will allow housing to be located a greater distance away from the noise of Route 128. Mr 1 <br /> Canale thought this was a good opportunity for a trade-off- development clustered in one part of the site in <br /> exchange for protection of wet lands and open space at the rear of the site. He thought this was not a site that <br /> ranked high enough in priority for the Town to spend money to protect. The protection can be obtained through <br /> cluster developments. Mr. Davies added that there are steep slopes and upland that need to be protected as well. <br /> h Lincoln Street: The Board agreed that this land should have a high priority for protection or public <br /> ownership. Beside hosting a variety of wildlife, it has "rural" characteristics like the Town of Lincoln. Mr <br /> Canale observed that the single most important feature is its close proximity to the Cambridge Reservoir The <br /> Board believes the current use of the site, a body shop and a sawmill, is very inappropriate. The Board <br /> concluded that the City of Cambridge Water Board should be encouraged to purchase the site if possible, but <br /> at the least, to monitor activity there to assure that the environment and the reservoir are not being harmed. <br /> c. Elks/Sellars Land: This site is a combination of two properties. A parcel owned by John Sellars on Concord <br /> Avenue is the subject of frequent development inquiries but is undevelopable by itself because it has only 27 <br /> feet of frontage. When combined with the Elks Club property, access could be obtained from Waltham Street. <br /> Mr. Canale commented on the changing character of the strip of Waltham Street between Concord Avenue and <br /> the Waltham City line. While much of it is zoned single family, there are very few single family houses and due <br /> to the high traffic volumes and other land use characteristics, the strip is not a good location for new single <br /> family housing. He urged that the Board develop a land use plan for the whole strip. <br /> In general, the Board thought that multi-family housing, commercial development, or institutional development <br /> may be an appropriate use of land in the strip and of this site. When the Town looks for places for tax <br /> generating uses, this may be a location to look at. Mr Davies suggested regional institutional uses that are not <br /> appropriate for single family neighborhoods might locate here. <br /> The Board thought the combined site might have a mixed use with residential in the rear of the site near the <br /> Concord Avenue neighborhood with more intensive use at the front oriented to Waltham Street. <br />