PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
<br /> MEETING OF APRIL 1, 1996
<br /> The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in Room G-15, Town Office Building, was called to order
<br /> at 7.37 p.m. by Chairman Davison, with members Colman, Davies, Merrill, Planning Director Bowyer, and
<br /> Assistant Planner Marino present. Mr Canale arrived during Item 67
<br /> ************************ ARTICLES FOR 1996 TOWN MEETING ************************
<br /> 67 Article 31 RS to RD Pelham Road. Grey Nuns: Mr. Bowyer reported that he had communicated to the
<br /> Grey Nuns the Board's concerns about their preliminary site development and use plan. He said they will make
<br /> the changes that the Board wants and will file a revised PSDUP incorporating these points.
<br /> Mr Bowyer, at the Planning Board's request, talked with the chairman of the Lexington Housing Assistance
<br /> Board and the COA director about their possible involvement in tenant selection at Youville Place. Marshall
<br /> Derby, chairman of LexHAB, said he does not believe LexHAB should be involved in monitoring compliance
<br /> with the assisted living program because fees include services other than rent. Linda Crew Vine, Council on
<br /> Aging director, said the COA is potentially interested in being involved but wants to understand all the
<br /> implications, money, staffing, etc., before committing to it.
<br /> On the motion of Mr Canale, seconded by Mr Merrill, the Board voted unanimously, 4-0, to recommend
<br /> approval of Article 31 conditioned on the requested change in the preliminary site development and use plan.
<br /> The Board reviewed and revised a draft report to Town Meeting. On the motion of Mr Canale, seconded by
<br /> Mr Merrill, the Board voted unanimously, 4-0, to approve the wording of the report to Town Meeting, as
<br /> amended.
<br /> 68. Article 31 RO to CD Waltham Street (Gravestar, Inca Mr Marino reported that David Spillane, site
<br /> designer, of Goody, Clancy and Associates, Architects, indicated to him that Gravestar is considering
<br /> withdrawing Article 32. Mr Bowyer reported further that in the discussion that Mr Marino had with the
<br /> applicant, they questioned whether indefinite postponement would have the same effect as a disapproval which
<br /> would trigger the repetitive petition provision in the State Zoning Act. For a petition that has been disapproved
<br /> within the previous two years, a favorable recommendation of four fifths of a future Planning Board is needed
<br /> to bring the petition before the future Town Meeting. He reported he had discussed the question with Mike
<br /> Callaghan, a zoning expert at Palmer& Dodge. Callaghan pointed out there was not any "black letter law" on
<br /> the subject but was confident withdrawal would not be treated in the same way as a disapproval because the
<br /> courts generally favor the right of petition to government bodies.
<br /> After some discussion about Gravestar, Inc.'s proposal to rezone land that is part of the Waltham Street Star
<br /> Market shopping plaza, on the motion of Mr Canale, seconded by Mr Merrill, the Board voted 3-2, Mrs.
<br /> Davison and Mr Davies opposed, to recommend disapproval of this article to Town Meeting. After reviewing
<br /> a draft report, on the motion of Mrs. Davison, seconded by Mr Merrill, the Board voted 3-2, Mrs. Davison
<br /> and Mr Davies opposed, to approve the report to Town Meeting, as written. Mr Davies explained he had
<br /> voted against the motion because he did not believe the report contained the spirit of encouragement he was
<br /> looking for
<br /> Later, Mr Merrill moved, and Mr Canale seconded that the motion to approve the report be reconsidered. That
<br /> motion was approved by a 4-1 vote, with Mrs. Davison opposed. Mr. Merrill said he now understood the points
<br /> raised by several Board members that the report should be more positive and encourage Gravestar to continue
<br /> working on the issues the Board had raised. He offered to work on a redraft.
<br />
|