Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br /> MEETING OF MARCH 25, 1996 <br /> The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in Room G-15, Town Office Building, was called to order <br /> at 7.48 p.m. by Chairman Davison, with members Canale, Colman, Planning Director Bowyer, and Assistant <br /> Planner Marino present. Mr. Merrill arrived during Item 61 Mr Colman left the meeting during Item 65 Mr <br /> Davies was absent. <br /> ****************** PLANNING BOARD ORGANIZATION, SCHEDULE ******************* <br /> 57 Welcome to New Member. The Board welcomed new member, Steven L. Colman. who was elected to a <br /> five-year term in the Town election on March 18, 1996. <br /> 58. Signature sheets for Registry of Deeds and Land Court: As required by State statute, the Board endorsed <br /> signature sheets, required to be on file with the Registry of Deeds and the Land Court, reflecting the current <br /> membership of the Board and staff members authorized to sign for the Board. <br /> ************************ ARTICLES FOR 1996 TOWN MEETING ************************ <br /> Citizens' Rezoning Petitions: Direction to the Staff to Prepare Reports to Town Meeting: <br /> 59 Discussion of General Procedures and Schedule for Zoning Articles at Town Meeting: The Board discussed <br /> the public hearings held on March 4 for the three citizens' articles. Mr Bowyer outlined the contents of the <br /> reports to Town Meeting and the likely production timetable. <br /> 60. Article 31 RS to RD Pelham Road. Grey Nuns: Mr Canale and Mrs. Davison reported on some of the <br /> issues that came out of the Town Meeting Members' bus tour of sites that are the subject of rezoning petitions <br /> to the Town Meeting. Regarding the 10 Pelham Road rezoning, some questioned the permanence of the <br /> proposed 500 foot setback on the Grey Nuns property to preserve the "front lawn." Others felt that the petitioner <br /> should offer more benefits to the town than those currently planned. Mr Canale wants to see the contents of <br /> Appendix E of the Preliminary Site Development and Use Plan moved into the main body of the document. <br /> Other issues discussed included. the tenant selection process, and the proposed marking of Massachusetts <br /> Avenue to improve safety at the Pelham Road intersection. <br /> 61 Article 32. RO to CD Waltham Street. Gravestar Inc. The Board observed that Gravestar, Inc.'s (the <br /> new property manager of the shopping plaza) proposal to use the rezoned parcel of land in Lexington for <br /> parking and landscaping is reasonable. The Board is concerned though that the proposal is not part of a larger <br /> plan to deal with the problems of the shopping plaza parking lot and traffic in the area. In all, there appear to <br /> be many loose ends in this proposal. Mr Bowyer observed that there are not enough commitments from the <br /> applicants at this point. The Board agreed to encourage the applicants to keep moving in the direction they are <br /> going and to come back when the details are more firm. Mr Colman suggested that the applicant be told their <br /> performance will be monitored over the year ahead. The Board agreed to recommend that Town Meeting <br /> disapprove the current proposal. <br /> 62. Article 33 CS to RS. Marrett Road. Butler Realty. A number of questions arose in the discussion about <br /> this rezoning petition for land at 581 Marrett Road. Are uses allowed in the CS commercial zone so uneconomic <br /> that houses offer more economic return than businesses do? Maybe the concept of the CS district - to provide <br /> a district for tradesmen and marginal uses -is not viable and residential property is too valuable. Perhaps this <br /> land should be zoned for a different commercial use, e.g., neighborhood, or retail and shopping. Mr Marino f <br /> presented a revenue comparison of the various zoning districts. <br /> r <br /> After more discussion, the Board agreed that the CS zone is an important part of the overall zoning scheme in <br /> Lexington. But, based on the deep penetration of this piece of property into the adjoining single family <br />