|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2023-07-13-TREE-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Tree Committee-TREE
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
2023-07-13-TREE-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2023 12:22:32 PM
Creation date
11/12/2023 7:29:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2023
Author or Source
Pat Moyer, Committee Member
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Tree Commi?ee Minutes 7/13/23 <br /> <br />1. Mee?ng called to order at 7:35 AM. <br />2. Discussion of scribing. Pat’s offer to scribe, going forward, was discussed and accepted. <br />3. Mee?ng minutes of 6/8/23 were approved. <br />4. Present: Gerry Paul, Pat Moyer (scribe), Mark Connor (presiding), Nancy Sofen, Barbara Tarrh, Charles <br />Hornig, Charlie Wyman, Joe Pato, Gloria Bloom <br />5. Discussion of u?lity of our in-between mee?ngs with DPW. Felt to be produc?ve and improving of our <br />rela?onship, and also help move our regular mee?ng along. Nancy suggested crea?ng an agenda so that <br />we could work towards resolu?on of some issues. The group mee?ng with Dave Pinsonneault is now <br />composed of Mark C, Barbara T, and Pat M. We did not yet receive Dave’s report (he is on jury duty and <br />the mee?ng didn’t occur this month); nor did we hear about hazard trees removed in last 2 months. <br />6. Nancy led a discussion of the process and preliminary results of the Tree Bylaw working group. The <br />group is composed of Nancy S, Barbara T, Gerry P, and Dan Miller. The very preliminary proposal is <br />a?ached. Much discussion followed. Discussion topics included: a) how the process for permi?ng and <br />inspec?on, and tree inspec?on, would be financed; b)educa?ng the town staff and public about the <br />value of trees; c) inquiring from towns with similar bylaws about how they enforce them; d) what type of <br />staff might this entail-- possibly an “enforcement agent”, not necessarily a TW; e) a need to have an <br />appeals process, and who that might be (?TC); f) that ideally the enforcement agent would be a <br />preserva?onist, but with very clear guidelines to use so that decision is easy to make and refer to during <br />disputes; and g) the need for a homeowner to hire an arborist to make health decisions about the tree. <br />Strategy was discussed for each of these. Permi?ng and only front setbacks first? Should the bylaw <br />group priori?ze vs trying to get it all done at one Town Mee?ng? Priori?zing setback trees and large old <br />trees? Town Mee?ng can pass a bylaw, but that does not mean that the Town can do it fiscally or <br />organiza?onally. If needs exceed $$, there would need to be an override called by the SB. Is there <br />enough support for this? <br />There is much educa?on and networking to be done. We need to work with other sustainability groups, <br />coordinate with DPW, expand public educa?on. The issue of seeking DPW approval was discussed. <br />At next mee?ng, more details will be presented, looking for a statement of support before beginning to <br />dialogue with other groups and the community. <br />7. Discussion of Pat and Mark’s le?er to the Town Manager (reques?ng he set up a working group as <br />suggested in item 5 of the Tree Statement of Concern) and his reply. TM wants to meet with SB before <br />establishing the group. He also wants to work on a complaint he has received. The SB mee?ng will <br />happen some?me in August. Joe men?oned that more info about the structure of the group, the skills <br />needed, and goals would be helpful to the SB. He suggested a group of 3-5 might be most effec?ve. <br />8. Regula?ons about site plan review are being reviewed by Planning Board who meets next Wed. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.