Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />Tree Commi?ee Minutes 7/13/23 <br /> <br />1. Mee?ng called to order at 7:35 AM. <br />2. Discussion of scribing. Pat’s offer to scribe, going forward, was discussed and accepted. <br />3. Mee?ng minutes of 6/8/23 were approved. <br />4. Present: Gerry Paul, Pat Moyer (scribe), Mark Connor (presiding), Nancy Sofen, Barbara Tarrh, Charles <br />Hornig, Charlie Wyman, Joe Pato, Gloria Bloom <br />5. Discussion of u?lity of our in-between mee?ngs with DPW. Felt to be produc?ve and improving of our <br />rela?onship, and also help move our regular mee?ng along. Nancy suggested crea?ng an agenda so that <br />we could work towards resolu?on of some issues. The group mee?ng with Dave Pinsonneault is now <br />composed of Mark C, Barbara T, and Pat M. We did not yet receive Dave’s report (he is on jury duty and <br />the mee?ng didn’t occur this month); nor did we hear about hazard trees removed in last 2 months. <br />6. Nancy led a discussion of the process and preliminary results of the Tree Bylaw working group. The <br />group is composed of Nancy S, Barbara T, Gerry P, and Dan Miller. The very preliminary proposal is <br />a?ached. Much discussion followed. Discussion topics included: a) how the process for permi?ng and <br />inspec?on, and tree inspec?on, would be financed; b)educa?ng the town staff and public about the <br />value of trees; c) inquiring from towns with similar bylaws about how they enforce them; d) what type of <br />staff might this entail-- possibly an “enforcement agent”, not necessarily a TW; e) a need to have an <br />appeals process, and who that might be (?TC); f) that ideally the enforcement agent would be a <br />preserva?onist, but with very clear guidelines to use so that decision is easy to make and refer to during <br />disputes; and g) the need for a homeowner to hire an arborist to make health decisions about the tree. <br />Strategy was discussed for each of these. Permi?ng and only front setbacks first? Should the bylaw <br />group priori?ze vs trying to get it all done at one Town Mee?ng? Priori?zing setback trees and large old <br />trees? Town Mee?ng can pass a bylaw, but that does not mean that the Town can do it fiscally or <br />organiza?onally. If needs exceed $$, there would need to be an override called by the SB. Is there <br />enough support for this? <br />There is much educa?on and networking to be done. We need to work with other sustainability groups, <br />coordinate with DPW, expand public educa?on. The issue of seeking DPW approval was discussed. <br />At next mee?ng, more details will be presented, looking for a statement of support before beginning to <br />dialogue with other groups and the community. <br />7. Discussion of Pat and Mark’s le?er to the Town Manager (reques?ng he set up a working group as <br />suggested in item 5 of the Tree Statement of Concern) and his reply. TM wants to meet with SB before <br />establishing the group. He also wants to work on a complaint he has received. The SB mee?ng will <br />happen some?me in August. Joe men?oned that more info about the structure of the group, the skills <br />needed, and goals would be helpful to the SB. He suggested a group of 3-5 might be most effec?ve. <br />8. Regula?ons about site plan review are being reviewed by Planning Board who meets next Wed. <br /> <br />