Laserfiche WebLink
128 to McGuire, and the addition of mixed-use housing to the corridor. FOR ACTION: A formal <br />briefing was requested from Town Staff after which the EDAC will provide some analysis on the 25% <br />design for Bedford Street/Hartwell study. <br /> <br />Ms. Iyer added that the Select Board was interested in if the MIT Lincoln Labs and USAF had been <br />engaged about these projects. Mr. Pronceck stated that new buildings are 7-10 years away. Traffic still <br />feels normal at this point which is not a good thing. Agrees that the land at Hartwell is really under- <br />utilized for development. <br /> <br />The group continued to discuss that multiple uses will be needed in Hartwell to support Housing and <br />Commercial development. Mr. Hornig stressed that a lot of residents feel that housing and life science <br />don’t mix. Mr. Pato stressed that this is actually about changing use of a residential zone to a commercial <br />zone, not that creating a new space – where the two could co-exist. The Chair noted that there are <br />hundreds of examples of where life science and residential space are being built and it is not a new thing. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortyl stressed that Hartwell Ave. doesn’t have the road access, nor does it have the density of <br />housing to support a retail area – like the 5 condo buildings in Burlington’s 3rd Avenue development. Ms. <br />Ortyl pointed out that density in Lexington Center is more supportive and may be easier to be successful <br />as a retail/housing development area. <br /> <br />Ms. Iyer is happy to talk to King Street about their recent successes of housing/commercial/lab mixed <br />construction. Mr. McGaw asked that all of EDAC members could identify projects that could help Mr. <br />Pato and Mr. Hornig’s question about informing Select Board and residents. FOR ACTION: The Chair <br />affirmed that all EDAC members should do research to identify better examples of mixed life <br />science/housing/ light manufacturing so as to better contextualize the future for residents. <br /> <br />There was no discussion on the TMOD as presented to Planning Board and Ms. Iyer planned to <br />schedule a briefing for the EDAC with the consultants. <br /> <br />Ms. Iyer provided an update on new Commercial Development in Lexington. “The Rev” (shuttle bus) is <br />adding 3 new headways starting in August. Ms. Iyer asked for the topline budget of the Rev. She stressed <br />that she needs to get more details from her colleagues on how this is funded and what specific sources the <br />town pays for. The Chair noted the importance of addressing the amount of money developers pay to <br />fund buses that no one rides. Mr. McGaw agreed that this is counter to our climate and economic <br />development work and should be looked into further. Ms. Iyer provided an oral briefing of new <br />developments in Lexington including: <br />i. 4 MaGuire Ave. the tenant is moving from Cambridge to Lexington. <br />ii. 95-99 Hayden is scheduled for Planning Board for 8/17 Public Hearing on their <br />plans. <br />iii. 1707 Mass Ave has now opened. <br />iv. Economic Development providing funding for free advertising in town paper and <br />$150K for hosting events leading up to Discovery Day in October. Planning is still <br />underway and expect to hear more at. <br /> <br />The EDAC also expressed its interest in the importance of investigating and understanding the <br />opportunity to rezone Lexington Center for our future housing needs. This Committee has raised the <br />importance of having a more strategic conversation quickly about how the municipal land in Lexington <br />Center could be used. Much like the Belmont Cushing Square effort or Waltham Street 3 story units there <br />is opportunity to better develop an approach to housing to meeting the needs of Lexington and our <br />business sector. <br /> <br />The Chair Moved adjournment and seconded by Mr. McGaw. The motion to adjourn was unanimously <br />approved.