Laserfiche WebLink
Tree Committee (TC) meeting February 9, 2023 <br /> <br />The meeting was called to order at 7:31 am. Present were: Gerry Paul, Nancy Sofen, <br />Pat Moyer, Mark Connell, Joe Pato, and Gloria Bloom (scribe). Visitors: Bill Singer, <br />Marcia Gens, and Charley Wyman <br /> <br />Minutes of 12/8 were approved. Minutes of 1/12 were approved with the addition of the <br />statement that “Jim and Mark were strongly opposed to the removal of the tree at the <br />MBTA bus stop on Mass. Ave”. <br /> <br />TC voted to support Article 25 put forth by the Historical Commission to increase the <br />demolition delay on homes in the Historical Commission inventory from the current one <br />year delay to a delay up to 21 months. <br /> <br />Gerry reported that on the previous Monday, he presented TC articles 28 and 29 to the <br />SB, which wanted more info. Gerry will work on improving the Article 28 presentation <br />for TM. Regarding Article 28, increasing the Tree Bylaw look-back period from 1 to 3 <br />years, the question arose whether there would be a need for a permit for tree removal of <br />any tree greater than 6” dbh in the setback in order validate the look-back provision. <br />Nancy suggested that permits may be necessary to ensure adequate enforcement but that <br />it is too close to TM to add a change of that magnitude to the motion . A look-back <br />period of 3 years will reduce the likelihood that owners will cut down trees prior to sale <br />to aid the sale. <br /> <br />Dave Pinsonneault could not attend the meeting, but said the canopy study will be put in <br />Drop Box for TC review. The SB review of the study is currently scheduled for March. <br /> <br />We discussed exemptions to MGL 87 and the Lexington Tree Bylaw. There should be a <br />public process unless an exemption (disease, hazard, etc .) applies, and thus be mitigation <br />based on the value of the tree for removed Town Trees. With a public process there is <br />input from neighbors and others that may consider esthetic as well as environmental <br />benefits. The town needs to define “hazard” and we need an agreement on declaring <br />exemptions. All TC members present agreed to sign a letter to Dave stating the above <br />requests (see attached). <br /> <br />Liaison report from Nancy on the PBCs “integrated design and construction policy”: <br />Construction on any lot greater than ½ acre need to be certifiable at the gold level of <br />SITES. They are discussing the need for native plants and heat island reduction. All <br />public trees, not just the street trees already covered under Chapter 87 state law would <br />require a hearing. According to Charlie, this would apply to the high school. <br /> <br />There will be a hearing before the PB on the Tracer Lane project on March 15.