|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2023-03-29-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
2023-03-29-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2023 10:53:53 AM
Creation date
4/6/2023 9:00:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2023
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes of the Lexington Planning Board <br />Wednesday, March 29, 2023 <br />Parker Room, Town Office Building <br />1625 Massachusetts Avenue, Lexington <br />6:00 pm <br /> <br />Lexington Planning Board <br />March 29, 2023 Meeting Minutes <br />Page 1 of 3 <br /> <br />Planning Board members present: Robert Peters, Chair; Michael Schanbacher, Vice-Chair; Melanie <br />Thompson, Clerk; Robert Creech, Charles Hornig, and Associate Member Michael Leon. <br />Also, present was Abby McCabe, Planning Director; Sheila Page, Assistant Planning Director. <br />Robert Peters, Chair of the Planning Board, called to order the meeting of the Lexington Planning Board <br />on Wednesday, March 29, 2023, at 6:00 pm in the Parker Room, Town Office Building, 1625 <br />Massachusetts Avenue. LexMedia recorded the meeting. <br />2023 Annual Town Meeting <br />Chair Peters informed the Board that the main agenda item was to review any new items that came in <br />relative to Article 34 to Amend the Zoning Bylaw and Zoning Map to allow Village and Multi-Family Overlay <br />Districts. He noted that two amendments have been submitted and a few others are in discussion. Chair <br />Peters informed everyone that they ask for people to summarize their proposals and the Board members <br />will save their comments until after all amendments have been discussed. <br />The Lexington Cluster Housing Study Group submitted a proposed floor amendment to phase in the <br />overlay districts. Mr. Shiple reported that he has heard concerns from Town Meeting members about the <br />number of overlay zoning districts and the total proposed size creating a concern that there could be too <br />much housing development too quickly. He noted that they have now also spoken to Mr. Kaufman who <br />submitted an amendment to their phasing amendment. After speaking with Mr. Kaufman they <br />recommend a revised floor amendment that would call for adopting the zoning districts now but that <br />development in the zoning areas in the second phase could not be unlocked unless 1,231 new dwelling <br />units haven’t been implemented by July 1, 2028. Mr. Shiple said the first phase meets the requirements <br />of the law and guidelines. <br />There was a question if Town Counsel had an opinion on the cap on the number of multi-family dwellings. <br />Ms. McCabe responded that Town Counsel did have concern about a dwelling unit cap because usually <br />the Attorney General has only supported such a limit if there was a specific reason and with an end date. <br />Typically rates of development limits are only temporary with something that needs to happen during the <br />intervening time. He was concerned such a limit would also not be approved by DHCD because the <br />Guidelines say the zoning can’t impose limits not on other by-right uses and the Town does not impose <br />such a rate of development limit on single-family housing. A phasing approach could be compliant if it <br />doesn’t impose a maximum limit. <br />Ms. McCabe informed the Board that Mr. Zabin has not formally submitted an amendment yet but he has <br />said he would like to submit a floor amendment that would remove the reference to the underlying zoning <br />districts to make the multi-family zoning be required and not optional. Mr. Zabin expressed concern for <br />development of one-family dwellings under this zoning and would like to prohibit that and require multi- <br />family development. Ms. McCabe had concern that this proposal is beyond the scope because the full <br />Article 34 zoning was designed as an optional overlay district, not to rezone all of these areas. She also <br />noted that one-family dwellings are not permitted under this proposed zoning, only under the underlying <br />zoning. <br />Board members also expressed concern that this proposal would not effectively do what he intends it to <br />do and would be beyond scope.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.