2022-07-12-TAC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

2 Relative to the letter’s ask for more frequency on Lexpress, Ms. Cattleman said if we had more money we would add more transit. Ms. Lyons spoke about how transit is valued differently less in the United States and that could be the root of the difference, between Ms. Tan’s experience in Singapore vs. Lexington. Mr. Botla said that that’s what he mentioned in his invitation to Ms. Tan. Ms. Barrett also reached out and said it was unfortunate they didn’t respond, but appreciated the letter. MassDOT Lexpress Vehicles Grant Application Ms. Barrett explained that Lexington requested 6, low-floor 14-passenger small cut-away vehicles, the largest configuration that does not require a CDL to operate. With the hope that finding operators for them will be more affordable and simpler due to the difficulty finding CDL operators at the moment. Ms. Barry mentioned how these are smaller than the current vehicles bringing in the question of capacity. She suggested that increased frequency could solve the concerns of lower seating. These vehicles would also be low-floor unlike previous Lexpress vehicles making them easier for seniors and anyone carrying carts or strollers on and have digital signage to be more able to reflect the route their operating. They continue to have bike racks. Ms. Barrett spoke about how some vehicles could be used for fixed route services, some on-demand, while retaining one as backup. The Town would have to change the current technology used to add on-demand, especially reservations. Overall, the service proposed under this grant brings down the hourly rate, potentially allowing for increased service. Ms. Barrett shared three considered FY23 rates. A factor is that fuel rates are increasing beyond the contract price and GPS adds cost. She mentioned that MBTA grants should be posted soon. Ms. Barrett mentioned multiple scenarios, without state vehicles. Since fuel prices are high and staffing is hard, vendors aren’t providing quotes at the moment bc of the unknowns. With state vehicles at the same service level, it drops from $85/hour to $50/hour and removes the vehicle cost. With state vehicles and increased service there would be 4 vehicles running 12 hours a day at 30 minute frequency. It adds on-demand service in Lexington only, Saturday service, and a connection to Burlington and Waltham or Waverly to create a 73 connection at Waverly. On demand vehicles are fairly inefficient and a balance of them would be needed to optimize service. Connecting people to transit. Ms. Lyons asked about scheduled buses at Alewife and somewhere else to add to the 2 buses after 6:30; potentially for restaurant workers. Ms. Lyons asked about what the fare would be for on- demand service? Ms. Barrett replied that on-demand would have a higher fare. The Ride has a long wait so more of the usage would likely be from seniors; they get limited Uber/Lyft credits when they first join. Ms. Dratch asked what the plan with school routes is. Ms. Barrett mentioned keeping the most popular fixed routes and that flexible tech can be flexible. Ms. Dratch asked about thoughts on keeping a larger vehicle and Ms. Barrett said that the state doesn’t have large vehicles— can go through the same bidding process as before to get large vehicles. Mr. Botla responded that he likes the Waverly idea, especially with the 73 and newly proposed crosstown route, and asked about similar connecting service to Arlington Heights for 77 to Harvard and the Red Line instead of Alewife for the late night service. Ms. Barrett