|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2022-04-05-HC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Historical Commission-HC
>
Minutes
>
2022
>
2022-04-05-HC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2023 6:56:26 PM
Creation date
1/3/2023 1:41:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2022
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - HC - Historical Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Hornig said we cannot require preservation, only provide incentives that will encourage <br />developers to preserve the home. <br />Ms. Bennett said that OSRD can help us preserve structures that are not currently on the <br />Inventory. There are two projects currently going through the Site Sensitive Development <br />process where the Commission would have had no jurisdiction because the houses are not on the <br />Inventory, but they potentially can be saved because of the incentives in the Site Sensitive <br />Development bylaw. <br />Purpose Section: <br />Preserve historically or architecturally significant buildings or places, including consideration for <br />siting, sight lines, and landscaping <br />Mr. Kalsow said he perceives a gap between the purpose section and the actual requirements of <br />the bylaw. Mr. Kalsow stated that by giving “by right” development powers to developers and <br />not including regulation of siting in the bylaw, the stated purpose cannot be achieved. <br />Mr. Hornig agreed that purposes are not enforceable. The issue of siting can be included in the <br />preservation restriction. He recommended that the Administrative Assistant of the Historical <br />Commission be included in the Design Review Team meetings, the staff-level group that is <br />involved in site planning for Planning Board review. <br />Requirements: <br />Historic Buildings shall not be included in the calculation of gross floor area under 6.12.3.7.a <br />and 6.12.3.7.b <br />Dwelling units within Historic Buildings shall not be included in the calculation of gross floor <br />area under 6.12.3.7.e and 6.12.3.7.f <br />This provides incentives for preserving historic houses by giving bonuses for permitted <br />development on the site. <br />Ms. Pursley expressed concerns that the gross floor area bonus is too rich and inquired about the <br />logic of including this instead of a bonus based on footprint. <br />Mr. Hornig stated that the goal is to give developers more buildable land area when there is a <br />historic house that is being preserved. The hope is that developers will have incentives to <br />preserve historic structures rather than tearing them down, even if tradeoffs are involved. Ms. <br />Pursley expressed concern about how the stated purpose of appropriate siting for historic <br />buildings will be achieved. The bonuses make it difficult to preserve any appropriate siting <br />around the historic structure, which can be as important as preserving the structure itself.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.