Laserfiche WebLink
A Board Member, Martha C. Wood, questioned if the soil has been tested for pfas (No, it has <br />only been tested for the basics). <br /> <br />Board Member, Norman P. Cohen, stated this is an opportunity to move the fence even further <br />back and leave space for maintenance (Property is a premium. Giving up land can cause <br />confusion in the future. It is typical practice to install fences six inches from the property line). <br /> <br />Chair, Ralph D. Clifford, questioned how tall the fence will be (Six feet). He stated that would be <br />compliant with zoning (That is the understanding). <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator, Julie Krakauer Moore, clarified the Special Permit request would be for <br />the retaining wall height because it is not setback its height. <br /> <br />Mr. Clifford questioned the max height of the retaining wall (36 inches). <br /> <br />An audience member, Robert Cataldo of 30 Solomon Pierce Road Lexington Ma, stated he has <br />little problem with what is being proposed. Due to the condition his mother-in-law’s property was <br />left in all work will be need to be done from the applicant’s side of the property. This is a better <br />proposal. <br /> <br />A Board Member, James Osten, questioned the site line and visibility for Mr. Cataldo (Mr. <br />Cataldo stated the site line is not affected by the fence because that is what it would be <br />anyways. What is left there is residual fill against the wall). <br /> <br />There were no further questions or comments from the audience. <br /> <br />There were no further questions from the Board. <br /> <br />The Hearing was closed at 7:27 pm (a roll call vote was taken: Ralph D. Clifford– Yes, James <br />Osten – Yes, Beth Masterman – Yes, Norman P. Cohen – Yes and Nyles N. Barnert – Yes). <br /> <br />Mr. Barnert stated when writing the new fence and wall bylaw they probably envisioned a step <br />up, not a step down. <br /> <br />Associate Member, Beth Masterman, questioned if is was possible to erect the fence without <br />going onto the neighbor’s property. <br /> <br />Mr. Clifford stated it is possible but it won’t be easy. <br /> <br />The Board of appeals voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, and zero (0) in abstention to <br />grant a SPECIAL PERMIT in accordance with the Zoning By-Law (Chapter 135 of the Code of <br />Lexington) section(s) 135-9.4 and 135-4.3.4 to allow a three-foot tall retaining wall to be located <br />six inches from the property line instead of the required three feet (a roll call vote was taken: <br />Ralph D. Clifford– Yes, James Osten – Yes, Beth Masterman – Yes, Norman P. Cohen – Yes <br />and Nyles N. Barnert – Yes). <br /> <br />The Board of appeals voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, and zero (0) in abstention to <br />grant a SPECIAL PERMIT in accordance with the Earth Fill and Removal Bylaw, Chapter 43 of <br />the Code of the Town of Lexington to allow fifty-four yards of fill to remain on the premises <br />rather than the maximum permitted twenty-five cubic yards (a roll call vote was taken: Ralph D.