Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. McNabb stated when there are events, unless you’re registered, you’re not supposed to be <br />on the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Liu stated the bylaw does allow for private functions but it has to be approved by the Board. <br /> <br />Mr. Barnert asked in the winter, when there is no golf, is the restaurant going to be open for <br />lunch and dinner (Mr. McNabb stated there would have to be enough volume. In the winter time <br />there is very little use there. They have had the opportunity to look at how much volume is going <br />through. The course has always been at 60-70% at capacity). <br /> <br />Chair, Ralph D. Clifford, stated parking is a major concern. He stated Mr. McNabb indicated <br />there were 75 people at the club at one point. He questioned where all the cars were parked <br />(Mr. McNabb stated that was not what he said. He stated by viewing the log-in sheets, the <br />historic usage has been between 60-70% of available time slots to play). <br /> <br />Mr. Clifford questioned how many people come to the rotary event on Mondays (Mr. McNabb <br />stated he’s not sure but he doesn’t believe he referenced 75 people). <br /> <br />Mr. Clifford questioned the pro shop (Mr. McNabb described the pro shop). <br /> <br />Mr. Clifford stated he is not against the overall concept of expanding the golf club but he has <br />qualms with how it’s being done. The design is like its turning its back on its neighborhood. The <br />oak tree is probably 250 years old, what is going to replace it is a utility function of having an <br />electrical transformer. The folks that live in the houses across the street get a view of a building <br />that looks like a commercial warehouse. Not sure that is an appropriate balance of the hardship <br />to the community versus the advantage of your proposals. <br /> <br />Mr. Clifford questioned if it was a men’s only club (Mr. Gilgun stated no). <br /> <br />Mr. Clifford questioned why the women’s locker room was so small (Mr. Gilgun stated it is based <br />on the historic use of the locker room facilities as well as the number of men versus female <br />members. There were several female members that were part of the planning committee that <br />contributed their concerns about locker room facilities. This is more than adequate to <br />accommodate the needs of the female members). <br /> <br />Mr. Clifford that is the same argument that the universities made when section 9 was adopted. <br />Then an amazing thing happened. They were forced to have the facilities for them and the <br />women were very much interested in participating in sports such as golf. Mr. Clifford stated he <br />would vote this proposal down with this space between the men’s and women’s locker room. <br /> <br />Mr. Gilgun questioned what impact that has on the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mr. Clifford stated the impact is on the community of Lexington because it is a facility that is <br />being allowed to develop in a way that discriminates against at least half of the citizens. <br /> <br />Mr. Gilgun stated that is an unfair characterization. <br /> <br />The Board and the golf course team discussed the locker rooms further. They also discussed <br />the wait list and the number of current members. <br />