2022-10-20-CPC-min - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

2 for up to $500 in tax exemptions/refunds for every $1,000 donated by an individual . Ms. Morrison also went into greater detail on the road ahead for the conversion to a 501(c)(3), including changing specific language in the Special Act that governs LexHAB. The process would take an entire legislative cycle to be completed, and that for a most speedy transition, a vote from Special Town Meeting is needed for there to be a “timely file” in the third week of January 2023. Finally, Ms. Morrison explained that the Select Board would still have a power over potential board members for the new LexHAB. Ms. Fenollosa asked what if any effect this arrangement of veto power by the Select Board would affect the status of LexHAB being an independent 501(c)(3). Ms. Morrison and Ms. Mizrahi explained that after speaking with Town Counsel, so long as the Special Act clearly states the independence of LexHAB from the Town, LexHAB would not be affected by this type of Select Board oversight. Ms. Fenollosa also asked Ms. Morrison about the future relationship between the Committee and the “new” LexHAB once the conversion is complete. Ms. Morrison said that LexHAB would continue to ask for money from the CPC, especially for specific projects. Ms. Walker asked Ms. Morrison about the number of non-SHI (Subsidized Housing Inventory) units and what the waiting list for an affordable housing unit was. Ms. Morrison explained that there are currently 29 non-SHI units available but that there is currently a 25-person waitlist for a one-bedroom unit from LexHAB. Ms. Walker then asked Ms. Morrison to clarify what would qualify as an emergency for non-SHI units. Ms. Morrison explained that emergencies would include things like Domestic Violence, homelessness or natural disaster. Ms. Walker then asked Ms. Morrison to clarify the definition of “homelessness.” Ms. Morrison explained that she did not have an emergency application on hand but clarified that the Town of Lexington does have a different working definition of homelessness than other agencies. Specifically, Ms. Morrison stated that the shelter system has a much more stringent definition for shelter. Mr. Pressman asked if the current draft of the bylaw specifically states that LexHAB will not be subject to public procurement. He also asked whether it had been determined that this language must be included or would the change of status automatically bring about that condition. This could become unpalatable to those who are firm union supporters. Ms. Morrison and Ms. Mizrahi explained that since the separation of LexHAB from the Town is explicitly stated in the Special Act, any confusion would be avoided. They also explained that the specific reason for moving away from the quasi-municipal nature is to avoid public procurement and not necessarily prevailing wages. Mr. Pressman then asked about the AMI (Area Median Income) status of those in non-SHI units, especially the status once the transition of LexHAB to a 501(c)(3) occurred. Mr. Pressman stated that with Lexington’s high median income and increasing home prices, there was a real danger of those that help keep Lexington going would be unable to afford to live here. Mr. Pressman then reiterated the need to protect those living at the lowest AMI and that more very low AMI units needed to be constructed. Mr. Pressman than stated that he would abstain from voting on the motion. Ms. Morrison asked if Mr. Pressman was concerned about non-SHI units being rented to those with a more moderate- income AMI. Mr. Pressman agreed with this and again stated that he needed to know if this was going to be the case and that the continued answer of “I can learn that after LexHAB is independent” is not an acceptable answer. Ms. Mizrahi stated that there is no requirement to