Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MARCH 18, 2009 <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board in the Cary Auditorium, Cary Memorial Hall <br />was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Vice Chairman Zurlo with members Manz, Galaitsis, Canale, <br />and planning staff McCall-Taylor and Henry present. Mr. Hornig joined the meeting in progress. <br />******************************MINUTES*************************************** <br />Mr. Galaitsis requested the minutes for February 18, 23, and 25 be deferred. Mr. Galaitsis said <br />this new system would take him more time to use; he will try it but may have to go back to the <br />attachments. Ms. Manz requested that they defer the minutes as well since she did not review <br />them. Mr. Zurlo said to give the new system a few weeks then decide how to proceed. Mr. <br />Hornig joined the meeting. <br />On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted, 5-0, to approve the minutes of February 11, <br />2009 as amended. <br />**********************SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATION************************* <br />Porter Lane Easement: Porter Lane subdivision abuts the Fiske School, which was trying to <br />make a handicapped accessible ramp. Because of slope issues the Town proposed to take an <br />easement from a private residential lot on the back corner for the ramp, but that would put this <br />lot above the impervious surface ratio (ISR) of 12%. Staff believes the right course of action <br />would be to go to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance. The owner was willing to give an <br />easement, but did not want to be non-conforming or in violation of their special permit. Mr. <br />Hornig said if they do not want to be non-conforming they would need a variance and a <br />modification to the special permit. <br />On motion duly made and seconded, it was voted, 5-0, to recommend the Zoning Board of <br />Appeals grant a variance and the Planning Board then modify the special permit. <br />Journey’s End: Mr. Henry said that a condition of the SPS had been that if the Town determined <br />within a year of the approval of the development that certain improvement on Shade Street were <br /> <br />