Laserfiche WebLink
Chair, Ralph D. Clifford, stated his concern for water run-off(There is a dip in the backyard. The <br /> driveway area seems pretty flat and he has never seen water runoff). <br /> The property grade was discussed. <br /> Mr. Clifford stated water run-off is a concern. He questioned if the applicant had considered a <br /> more pervious surface option (They had not considered it). <br /> Mr. Clifford questioned if doing this with a pervious paver would be agreeable (They would <br /> consider it). <br /> Building Commissioner, James Kelly, stated the neighbor's house at 105 Gleason Road had <br /> been raised. The water runs more towards 103 Gleason Road. He discussed pervious surface <br /> options. <br /> An audience member, Kathryn Roy of 382 Marrett Rd, stated the cost of an easy pave grid for <br /> the driveway and stated it is not an outrages fee. This is a grid that is laid down and covered in <br /> dirt. <br /> Mr. Pawar stated the ideal case is the driveway to look like a seamless single driveway. <br /> The Hearing was closed at 7:28 pm (a role call was taken: Ralph D. Clifford—Yes, Jeanne K. <br /> Krieger—Yes, Martha C. Wood —Yes, Norman P. Cohen —Yes and James Osten—Yes). <br /> Mr. Osten stated the concern if they paved one foot from the fence and then a larger home is <br /> put in, the new design would reflect the 1-foot setback. He has no problem with pervious <br /> surface. <br /> Mr. Clifford stated whatever they do on that lot would need a special permit. <br /> Ms. Krieger stated her support for the pervious surface. <br /> Mr. Clifford stated clearing snow would be more challenging. It sounds like the board is in favor <br /> of pervious surface. <br /> The fence abutting the driveway was discussed and the Board agreed they had further <br /> questions for the applicant. <br /> The hearing was re-opened at 7:33 pm (a role call was taken: Ralph D. Clifford—Yes, Jeanne K. <br /> Krieger—Yes, Martha C. Wood —Yes, Norman P. Cohen —Yes and James Osten—Yes). <br /> Mr. Pawar stated the previous neighbor said it was a shared fence. There is no proof of that. <br /> Mr. Cohen questioned who's land the fence was on (It's on the property line). <br /> The Hearing was closed at 7:35 pm (a role call was taken: Ralph D. Clifford—Yes, Jeanne K. <br /> Krieger—Yes, Martha C. Wood —Yes, Norman P. Cohen —Yes and James Osten—Yes). <br /> The Board agreed on the conditions that the applicant maintain the fence, the driveway must be <br /> pervious surface and the opening at the road can only be 3 feet larger. <br />