|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2022-02-10-ZBA-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Board of Appeals-ZBA
>
Minutes
>
2022
>
2022-02-10-ZBA-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2022 1:50:17 PM
Creation date
5/12/2022 1:50:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2022
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - ZBA - Zoning Board of Appeals
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair, Ralph D. Clifford, stated his concern for water run-off(There is a dip in the backyard. The <br /> driveway area seems pretty flat and he has never seen water runoff). <br /> The property grade was discussed. <br /> Mr. Clifford stated water run-off is a concern. He questioned if the applicant had considered a <br /> more pervious surface option (They had not considered it). <br /> Mr. Clifford questioned if doing this with a pervious paver would be agreeable (They would <br /> consider it). <br /> Building Commissioner, James Kelly, stated the neighbor's house at 105 Gleason Road had <br /> been raised. The water runs more towards 103 Gleason Road. He discussed pervious surface <br /> options. <br /> An audience member, Kathryn Roy of 382 Marrett Rd, stated the cost of an easy pave grid for <br /> the driveway and stated it is not an outrages fee. This is a grid that is laid down and covered in <br /> dirt. <br /> Mr. Pawar stated the ideal case is the driveway to look like a seamless single driveway. <br /> The Hearing was closed at 7:28 pm (a role call was taken: Ralph D. Clifford—Yes, Jeanne K. <br /> Krieger—Yes, Martha C. Wood —Yes, Norman P. Cohen —Yes and James Osten—Yes). <br /> Mr. Osten stated the concern if they paved one foot from the fence and then a larger home is <br /> put in, the new design would reflect the 1-foot setback. He has no problem with pervious <br /> surface. <br /> Mr. Clifford stated whatever they do on that lot would need a special permit. <br /> Ms. Krieger stated her support for the pervious surface. <br /> Mr. Clifford stated clearing snow would be more challenging. It sounds like the board is in favor <br /> of pervious surface. <br /> The fence abutting the driveway was discussed and the Board agreed they had further <br /> questions for the applicant. <br /> The hearing was re-opened at 7:33 pm (a role call was taken: Ralph D. Clifford—Yes, Jeanne K. <br /> Krieger—Yes, Martha C. Wood —Yes, Norman P. Cohen —Yes and James Osten—Yes). <br /> Mr. Pawar stated the previous neighbor said it was a shared fence. There is no proof of that. <br /> Mr. Cohen questioned who's land the fence was on (It's on the property line). <br /> The Hearing was closed at 7:35 pm (a role call was taken: Ralph D. Clifford—Yes, Jeanne K. <br /> Krieger—Yes, Martha C. Wood —Yes, Norman P. Cohen —Yes and James Osten—Yes). <br /> The Board agreed on the conditions that the applicant maintain the fence, the driveway must be <br /> pervious surface and the opening at the road can only be 3 feet larger. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.