Laserfiche WebLink
227 <br /> APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE <br /> DATE: May 24, 1976 <br /> TIME: 7 :30 P.M. <br /> PLACE: Town Office Building, Room 111 <br /> PRESENT: Edward E. Furash, Chairman, Donald B. White , Vice Chairman- <br /> Schools, Peter Hall, Vice Chairman-General Gov' t. , J.H. <br /> Blaisdell, Secretary, Mitzi Kutchin, Patricia Hagedorn, <br /> Richard M. Perry, Ex-officio <br /> P� <br /> I. Minutes of May 3, 1976 were read by Secretary Blaisdell and <br /> were approved by the Committee with one correction under Item <br /> III -- "It should read: Account #5450 - Road Machinery, instead <br /> of Account #5500. <br /> II . RE-ORGANIZATION OF APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE <br /> Upon unanimous approval of the Committee the following officers <br /> were appointed: <br /> Edward E. Furash - Chairman <br /> Harry A. Hall III - Vice Chairman-Gen. Gov't. <br /> Donald B. White - Vice Chairman-Schools <br /> J. Harper Blaisdell - Secretary <br /> III . APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE REPORT <br /> Chairman Furash approved a bill amounting to $1,518.24 to cover <br /> the cost of printing the Appropriation Committee Report for 1976. <br /> (Spaulding Company) <br /> IV. CONSERVATION <br /> a. Chairman Furash presented the Committee with a letter from <br /> the Conservation Committee Chairman, Angela Frick to EAT <br /> Realty Trust, dated April 29, 1976, re land adjacent to <br /> North Lexington Brook. (on file ) <br /> b. A request for a Reserve Fund Transfer in the amount of <br /> $450.00 to pay for Secretarial services for the last six weeks <br /> of fiscal '75- '76 was discussed by the Committee. Mr. Perry <br /> stated that there were such funds put 'into the clerical pool <br /> to cover these services. Secretary Blaisdell suggested that <br /> the Committee not pass on any such matter until it passes <br /> through the proper channels. <br /> V. COLLECTIVE BARGAINING <br /> A memorandum dated April 15, 1976, from Town Manager O'Connell <br /> re the challenge of the Collective Bargaining Law - Chapter 150-E- <br /> Mass. was presented to the Committee. It so stated that Arlington <br /> is now challenging the binding arbitration feature and it is now <br /> before the Mass. Supreme Court. (on file) <br />