|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2003-09-04-AC-MIN.pdf
Breadcrumb Navigation:
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Appropriation Committee-AC
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003-09-04-AC-MIN.pdf
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2022 3:31:04 PM
Creation date
3/8/2022 3:30:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2003
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - AC - Appropriation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROPRAITION COMMITTEE MEETING <br /> SEPTEMBER 4, 2003, ROOM 111, 7:30 PM <br /> Present: D Brown, P Hamburger, S Spector, K Dooks, E Michelson, R Eurich, A Levine, <br /> J Ryan <br /> Also Present: T Griffiths, G Burnell, R White, J Bartenstein, Jed Snyder <br /> • 2020 Committee: P Hamburger on behalf of the 2020 Committee asked if any of <br /> the AC members would attend a meeting to discuss possible multi year <br /> projections. D Brown A Levine and S Spector indicated that they would try to <br /> attend with P Hamburger. <br /> • R White discussed the Early Retirement Incentive legislation currently before the <br /> BOS. He wishes to review the data to be provided by the actuaries before making <br /> any recommendations. He senses that the Fiscal 2005 budget will reflect further <br /> reductions in staff. If that were the case he would prefer to reduce staff through <br /> attrition rather than layoffs. The Fiscal 2004 budget was adopted with a need for <br /> the municipal side to reduce staffing levels by$225,000,which has yet to be <br /> done. Thus far between 30 and 40 employees have expressed some interest in the <br /> program. R White also discussed the"pension deferral/holiday"which he does <br /> not support. All of his comments are his feelings and are not reflective of the <br /> BOS. They have not come to any conclusion regarding these two options. <br /> • R White also reported that there will be no revenue deficit in Fiscal 2003 due <br /> primarily to budget reversions. <br /> • Discussed the possibility of reducing the Fiscal 2004 local estimated receipts <br /> figure from the current estimate. <br /> • Discussed the possibility of appropriating additional funds to Snow & Ice in <br /> Fiscal 2004 in an attempt to minimize the possible Fiscal 2004 Snow &Ice <br /> deficit, which will have to be raised in Fiscal 2005. General sense was that with <br /> all the other issues it would be difficult to increase the appropriation by$400,000. <br /> Discussed possibility of incrementally increasing the appropriation over a number <br /> of years. <br /> • R White discussed the budget process for Fiscal 2005 and distributed a tentative <br /> schedule. <br /> • BOS are having their goal-setting meeting on September 24, 2003. <br /> • The BOS and SC are attempting to schedule an executive meeting to discuss <br /> collective bargaining issues, The meeting will probably not be until after <br /> September 22nd due to scheduling conflicts. <br /> • R White expressed concern over as change in the budget culture and the <br /> questioning the integrity of department's heads. Staff recommendations are <br /> sometimes dismissed or questioned. <br /> • AC discussed when to distribute the memo to the BOS dated August 26, 2003. <br /> The SC and CEC have been given a copy. D Brown will talk with L McSweeney. <br /> • G Burnell(Chairman) gave an overview of the goals of the CEC during the <br /> upcoming year. <br /> • P Hamburger raised the issue of going forward with the Fiske School. Some <br /> people felt that the Fiske had made it onto the recent list <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.