|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1998-02-04-AC-MIN.pdf
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Appropriation Committee-AC
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998-02-04-AC-MIN.pdf
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2022 1:34:07 PM
Creation date
3/8/2022 1:33:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
1998
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - AC - Appropriation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE MEETING <br /> WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 1998 <br /> COMPTROLLER'S OFFICE,7:30 PM <br /> Present: P Lapointe, P Hamburger, A Levine,R Borghesani, S Coit,I Mroczkowski, <br /> R Pawliczek, C Abbott,R Colwell, J Ryan <br /> • MOTION: Approve minutes of January 22, 1998,Unanimous <br /> • AC need to take a position on articles by February 26th <br /> • Positions need to be taken on: <br /> ArticleA4 Capital Article <br /> School Project(s) <br /> Free Cash <br /> Articles that appear to have a payback need to analyzed <br /> Streets ( $ 555,000), I&I($3,000,000)leak detection,DPW Building and landfill <br /> Recycling costs: NESWC tipping fees. Potential shut down due to local concerns over <br /> environmental issues. <br /> • General discussion of Article 42, Guidelines for Financing Capital Expenditures. <br /> Linking of Stabilization Fund and"free cash". Not much support for the Stabilization <br /> Fund <br /> • C Abbott discussed the findings of the PILOT Committee(3 for and 3 against). <br /> Those opposed were not Town Meeting members while those supporting PILOT's <br /> were Town Meeting members. What is the split between residential and commercial <br /> costs for the PILOT's? Tax break is not significant. PILOT'S do not benefit <br /> taxpayers due to the charges not being deductible. <br /> • P Lapointe discussed the school projects. Project must be reimbursable. Committee <br /> made up of PBC, CEC,AC,BOS, SC and those opposing the project. Affordability <br /> not yet defined. Secondary schools should be done first. <br /> • A Levine suggested that perhaps a part of the school project be places on an override <br /> vote with the remainder being paid from the tax levy. <br /> Ac2.4.98 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.