|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1996-04-03-AC-MIN.pdf
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Appropriation Committee-AC
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
1996-04-03-AC-MIN.pdf
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2022 12:48:21 PM
Creation date
3/8/2022 12:46:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
1996
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - AC - Appropriation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE MEETING <br /> WEDNESDAY, APRIL 3, 1996 <br /> COMPTROLLER'S OFFICE, 7:30 PM <br /> * Present: P Lapointe, M Miley, J Pagett, M Hastings, R Colwell, L Peck, J Ryan <br /> * Absent: R Leone, M Mairson, R Borghesani <br /> * P Lapointe distributed a draft of the AC Report to Town Meeting <br /> * AC reviewed the draft and commenced discussion <br /> * P Lapointe discussed Article 17, Fire Pumper purchase. Discussion followed over the <br /> possibility of funding the pumper with free cash and leaving Town Meeting with <br /> approximately $ 750k vs $ lmm in free cash. If the pumper were to be funded in this <br /> manner then the AC would be successful in starting the process of using free cash for <br /> capital requirements. <br /> * MOTION: To reconsider Article 17. UNANIMOUS <br /> * MOTION: To recommend that the pumper, in the amount of $ 262,500 be purchased <br /> with free cash. UNANIMOUS <br /> * L Peck suggested that the cuts and shifts be clearly identified in the report <br /> * R Colwell stated that he feels that Town Meeting is perhaps going to be inclined to set <br /> aside specific funding for capital needs in the future. <br /> * R Colwell suggested that the gap, as it appears on page 2,be easily understood as to how <br /> it was closed. <br /> * P Lapointe discussed the inflation information as it appears on page 3. Budget requests <br /> are greater than inflation. Should they be?? Should the requests be limited to a 2 1/2% <br /> increase?? <br /> * R Colwell felt that the requests should fall within expected revenue increases <br /> * P Lapointe discussed the MMRVHS on going issue <br /> * There was some discussion on the Reserve Fund. Keep it, assign it to the Town <br /> Manager?? <br /> * MOTION: To reconsider Article 11. UNANIMOUS <br /> * MOTION: To recommend an appropriation of $ 105,000.UNANIMOUS <br /> * MOTION: To reconsider Article 12. UNANIMOUS <br /> * MOTION: To recommend an appropriation of $ 225,000. UNANIMOUS <br /> * MOTION: To reconsider Article 36. UNANIMOUS <br /> * MOTION: To rescind the previous vote on Article 36. UNANIMOUS <br /> * J Pagett expressed concern that not much appears in the report regarding the School <br /> Department request under Article 4. <br /> General discussion followed. There isn't much on the Town side either. Time is very <br /> limited and perhaps it would be best if comments be made by P Lapointe when he makes <br /> a report under Article 2 on April 22nd. <br /> * P Lapointe will finalize report to go to printer on Thursday. <br /> * MOTION: To adjourn <br /> acmt4396 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.