|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1995-10-17-AC-MIN.pdf
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Appropriation Committee-AC
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
1995-10-17-AC-MIN.pdf
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2022 4:12:18 PM
Creation date
3/7/2022 4:11:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
1995
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - AC - Appropriation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE MEETING <br /> TUESDAY,OCTOBER 17, 1995 <br /> COMPTROLLER'S OFFICE, 7:30 PM <br /> Present: P Lapointe, M Miley, R Leone, M Mairson, J Pagett, R Colwell, R Borghesani, <br /> J Ryan <br /> Absent: L Peck, M Hastings <br /> * MOTION: Accept minutes of October 10, 1995, UNANIMOUS <br /> * M Miley will attend ATFC Annual Meeting on October 28, 1995 <br /> * J Pagett & J Ryan requested that the AC give the Special Education Task Force <br /> Committee a sense as to the areas that the AC would like the committee to review. <br /> Some of the areas suggested for review were benchmarking other communities, what <br /> constitutes special education, should there be a third party audit of costs, how much <br /> inclusion, why is there such an apparent difference between what Lexington offers and <br /> what other communities offer, what is the number of students as a % of the school <br /> population by group (grade levels), cost to educate specific disabilities, what is the <br /> METCO mix, do we need a special education contingency or can we over expend as we <br /> are allowed to do with snow & ice, do all students go through a review process prior to <br /> being assigned a tutor, does any one leave the program, establish trends over time, <br /> number of students, categories, costs per child <br /> Data being gathered is not necessarily consistent from town to town or within a <br /> community. There are no clear cut guidelines established by DOE for the classification <br /> of expenses and revenues. Too much discretion allowed in classifying expenses therefore <br /> difficult to arrive at good comparisons. <br /> * P Lapointe indicated that he had had a brief discussion with A Fredlich of the TMMA <br /> Executive Board and they wish to pressure the BOS and SC to arrive at a budget figure <br /> four weeks prior to the start of Town Meeting. No one can force the issue as it has <br /> been attempted in the past without much success. <br /> * P Lapointe will contact R White and J Young and reinforce the AC's recommendation <br /> as they appear in the 1995 AC Report to Town Meeting. <br /> * R Leone suggested that if the BOS and SC can't submit a budget perhaps the AC should. <br /> * General discussion of long range planning. AC needs to draft a few scenarios with some <br /> more realistic or at least different assumptions from those being made by the Town <br /> Manager. <br /> * R Leone stated that the planning should go out ten years vs five and collapse some of the <br /> detail in an attempt to get all the projections on perhaps three pages. Need to show <br /> revenue and expense, a balance sheet and the tax impact. Capital questions need to be <br /> addressed and perhaps we should be depreciating our fixed assets in an attempt to be <br /> in a better position to fund capital needs. <br /> * P Lapointe will attempt a couple of scenarios for the next meeting. <br /> * Next meeting scheduled for Wednesday, November 8, 1995 <br /> ac10.10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.