|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1995-03-22-AC-MIN.pdf
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Appropriation Committee-AC
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
1995-03-22-AC-MIN.pdf
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2022 3:38:33 PM
Creation date
3/7/2022 3:38:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
1995
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - AC - Appropriation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br /> APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE <br /> MARCH 22, 1995 <br /> Attendance: P. Lapointe, M. Mairson, R. Neumeier, R. Leone, J. Pagett, L. Peck, R. <br /> Borghesani, Tvi. Miley, C. Coughlin <br /> Absent: J. Ryan <br /> P. Lapointe reviewed the current budget status. At Monday's Selectmen's meeting, R. <br /> White announced that the Municipal Salary Adjustment could be reduced by $28,116 - <br /> approximately $24,000 from the General Fund and the remainder from Water/Sewer <br /> Enterprise. <br /> There was a lengthy discussion of the School Budget. It was expressed that the A.C. <br /> would encourage the School Committee to look at the transportation costs for an <br /> additional budget adjustment (fee for service). <br /> Motion: To approve a FY96 appropriation to the Lexington Public Schools of <br /> $37,409,921 (an increase of$2,276044). The Committee would encourage the School <br /> Committee to look at the compensation increases and transportation fees for the necessary <br /> reductions. The Committee would include the $10,900 Internet subscription in the School <br /> Budget. Moved by Borghesani, seconded by Coughlin <br /> Discussion on motion: <br /> Leone indicated that he was unable to support any of the current scenarios - he did not see <br /> that they were sustainable over time, there were no productivity improvements. He urged <br /> the Committee to look at the fiscal burden on the town. <br /> Pagett indicated her belief that we need to work with the budget we have before us and <br /> the people currently in place. A lot of good issues have been raised and the Committee <br /> should make those suggestions for the FY97 budget process. <br /> Mairson said that she would support the motion. <br /> Peck indicated her frustration with the school budget. The town needs to look long-term. <br /> Perhaps we should look at a percentage increase as a way to coalesce around a number- <br /> perhaps 6.5%. <br /> The issue of the impact of the special ed increase on available funding for other programs <br /> was raised. Miley described how the state of Washington handles special ed planning. <br /> Motion was defeated 1-8. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.