Laserfiche WebLink
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE MEETING <br /> MONDAY, MAY 9, 1994 <br /> COMPTROLLER'S OFFICE, 7:30 PM <br /> Present: C Coughlin, C Abbott, P Lapointe, J Pagett, M Mairson, R Souza, <br /> R Borghesani, S Nablo, J Ryan, S Elberger(SC) <br /> Absent: G Burnell <br /> * MOTION to accept minutes of April 13, 1994. <br /> UNANIMOUS <br /> * C Coughlin chaired the meeting. The AC will present formally its position on school <br /> choice tomorrow evening at the SC meeting. The meeting was opened to discuss the sense <br /> of the AC as to how the recently concluded Town Meeting went. <br /> * J Pagett expressed some thoughts as to how the future AC conduct its business. It is <br /> important that a scheme be developed which will insure quick access to votes taken by <br /> the AC on the financial and other articles. It is imperative that votes of the AC be <br /> properly stated to the Town Meeting must accurately reflect the opinion of the AC to the <br /> degree of indicating the number of votes for and against each issue. There needs to be <br /> f, tabulation of all votes and amendment. <br /> A general discussion followed these points with an unanimous agreement. <br /> * S Nablo stated that he felt that the AC was failing in its role with Town Meeting. He <br /> expressed lack of communication between the AC and the BOS and the Town Manager. <br /> He also expressed frustration that no constructive progress was made with Town Meeting <br /> in the area of privatization. In order to be afforded ample time to present alternatives to <br /> Town Meeting. it was suggested that the method to be used should be in the form of an <br /> article rather than an amendment. General consensus was that this procedure be <br /> reviewed and implemented. It will however require earlier action by the AC. <br /> * C Coughlin suggested that perhaps the AC change its meeting night to either Wednesday <br /> or Thursday so as not to conflict with either that BOS or SC meetings. General sense was <br /> that the idea made sense. <br /> * J Pagett also discussed the need to have other AC members stand and make oral <br /> presentations in support of AC amendments or motions. There was a sense that these <br /> presentations should also be rehearsed. <br /> * General discussion of the implications of Article 31. <br /> * P Lapointe stated that he felt the AC needed to get started earlier, frame and limit the <br /> number of issues we wish to concentrate on. He also stated that he was actively seeking <br /> the position of Chairman of the AC for the upcoming fiscal year. <br /> * P Lapointe distributed AC Recommendations on Financial Matters Proposed Outline. <br /> Each member received a copy and will discuss the contents at a subsequent meeting. <br /> * Motion to adjourn <br /> acmtmy9 <br />