Laserfiche WebLink
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE MEETING <br /> SELECTMEN'S MEETING ROOM <br /> FEBRUARY 7, 1994, 7:30 PM <br /> Present: G Burnell, C Coughlin, R Souza, C Abbott, J Pagett, R Borghesani, <br /> M O'Sullivan, P Lapointe, J Ryan <br /> Absent: S Nablo, M Mairson <br /> * Minutes of January 31st and February 1st, accepted as amended (unanimous) <br /> * Capital Expenditures Committee attended for comments of capital articles <br /> * CEC members attending were N Cannalonga, P Hamburger, G Holland, K Dooks <br /> * N Cannalonga discussed the Recreation requests: Article 13 apparently is <br /> seeking $ 160,000.Improvements at Pine Meadows will account for $ 125,000 <br /> of the request in order to make necessary improvements in accordance with <br /> the golf course master plan. CEC supports this request. The remaining $ 50,000 <br /> Article 14, is for a tot lot and storage shed at Lincoln Field, the final phase of the <br /> Lincoln Field development. CEC does not support this request and feels that there <br /> are more pressing needs that the Recreation Committee should be addressing with <br /> limited resources. <br /> * CEC then discussed the Central Dispatch request. Originally thought to be in <br /> the area of $ 1,375,000,the request increased to $ 1,800,000 on January 31st. <br /> The CEC believes that the request also includes ADA work, both internal and <br /> external, replacement of the cells, radio equipment for the cruisers and the <br /> dismantling and relocation of the wiring of the fire alarm boxes except for those in public <br /> buildings and commercial and industrial buildings where the landowner pays for the boxes. <br /> CEC feels that the $ 1,800,000 is excessive and will support the original <br /> request, less 10%, or approximately $ 1,200,000. <br /> * General discussion as to how we will pay for this improvement and is it all <br /> necessary. CEC feels that some of the costs can be deferred or eliminated in the <br /> area of ADA and accreditation. Strong sentiment that the "fat"must be squeezed <br /> from the request, do we need the "Cadillac"??. <br /> * CEC indicated that the Town Manager's budget shows no funding for neither the <br /> ambulance replacement nor the boiler replacement at the East lexington <br /> Fire Station and yet the ambulance is contained in Article 16. Seems to be <br /> a significant amount of confusion as to how the dollar requests were arrived <br /> at in a number of the capital articles. <br /> * CEC discussed the DPW equipment request, Article 9. There has been no funding <br /> in this area for three years and this is a way of " catching up". DPW list <br /> calls for the replacement of 22 pieces of equipment. CEC can support approximately <br /> $ 650,000,with no request for the next three years. There should be an offsetting <br /> decline in maintenance. CEC stated that $ 426,000 of the request is critical and the <br />