|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
1993-10-27-AC-MIN.pdf
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Appropriation Committee-AC
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
1993-10-27-AC-MIN.pdf
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2022 2:26:17 PM
Creation date
3/7/2022 2:25:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
1993
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - AC - Appropriation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE MEETING <br /> OCTOBER 27, 1993 <br /> COMPTROLLER OFFICE, 7:30 PM <br /> Present: G. Burnell, S. Nablo, M. Mairson, J. Pagett, C. Coughlin, C. Abbott, <br /> R. Borghesani, P. Lapointe, M. O'Sullivan, J. Ryan <br /> Absent. R Snuca <br /> Also Present: J. Oberteuffer, J. Young, L. Lees <br /> * Minutes of October 25, 1993 meeting accepted with addition of building consolidation <br /> added and spelling errors corrected. Unanimous <br /> * S. Nablo commented that the Town Manager had not mentioned the consolidation of the <br /> Recreation Dept with DPW when he met with the Committee on October 25th. It was <br /> felt that the proposal was probably not fully discussed with the BOS and will <br /> probably be discussed at a later date. <br /> * J. Young distributed a handout on enrollments, the school budgetary process <br /> * J. Oberteuffer discussed the need to prioritized programs once again due to <br /> continuing budgetary problems. <br /> * Over the past five years the enrollment system wide has increases by over 500 <br /> while the per pupil cost has dropped below $ 6,000 per pupil <br /> * The opening of Hastings appears to be the top priority of the SC for FY 95, while they <br /> continue to look at elementary art, music, foreign languages as possible cuts. <br /> * The assessment of fees has reached the maximum. Stain on a lot of families for sports <br /> and busing fees. Some sense that they shouldn't be there if the school system is <br /> public. <br /> * Alternative to opening Hastings is to attempt to free up other space or increase <br /> class size at the elementary level. <br /> * SC will meet on November 5th in order to prepare for the joint meeting with all <br /> the boards and committees on November 8th. <br /> * Hastings re-opening is clearly the priority having been voted as such on three separate <br /> occasions. The re-opening will undoubtedly need an override. <br /> * General discussion of Ed Reform and the potential impacts on Lexington <br /> * School Choice decision has not been made by the SC, in accordance with ED Reform <br /> but must be done so no later than June 1, 1994. SC has previously rejected <br /> School Choice <br /> * General discussion of the decentralization impact brought about by Ed Reform. <br /> J. Young indicated that Lexington was already somewhat decentralized and therefore the <br /> imp[act will hopefully be minimal. <br /> * J. Young stated that Lexingtron is at a crossroad and the citizens must make <br /> a decision as to the type of school system it wishes to have.If there is no <br /> override the elementary, particularly, as well as the entire system will be <br /> adversely affected. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.