|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2021-11-18-ZBA-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Board of Appeals-ZBA
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
2021-11-18-ZBA-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2022 9:20:38 AM
Creation date
1/28/2022 9:20:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Year
2021
Department
Town Clerk
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - ZBA - Zoning Board of Appeals
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECEIVED <br /> 022 28 Jain, 919 aui °m <br /> TOWN CLERK <br /> LEXINGTON MA <br /> screened (That is not their dumpster. That letter also asked how they would control traffic speed <br /> of a-bikes on the bikeway but they cannot do anything about that). <br /> The Board asked the Zoning Administrator to take note of that dumpster and lighting. <br /> Mr. Cadenhead stated they are trying to clean up the backside of that building. <br /> A Board Member, Martha C. Wood, stated the letter also mentioned unshielded lights on the <br /> back of the building (There are security lights on the back of the building that were already there <br /> and have been turned off). <br /> Ms. Krieger asked what the regulations are regarding electric bikes (They are not regulated. <br /> There are two bills, if passed, would regulated them into different classes). <br /> Mr. Cadenhead stated the sign is not advertising a product, it is just the name of the shop in a <br /> mural. <br /> An Audience member, Norma Floyd of 16 Oxford Street, stated the applicant has painted the <br /> sign before receiving any permission. No other business has any such advertising and are <br /> concerned for the applicant's intentions. She stated her concern for safety on the bikeway. <br /> There is no advantage to the bikeway to have advertising painted two stories high. <br /> An Audience member, Chris Floyd of 16 Oxford Street, stated the mural looks directly into Bow <br /> Street Park. <br /> There were no further questions or comments from the audience. <br /> There were no further questions or comments from the Board. <br /> Mr. Cadenhead stated he understands the importance of signs and their placement on the <br /> bikeway. The mural sign was done because they thought they were working within parameters <br /> of what was allowed. <br /> The Hearing was closed at 5:25 pm (a role call was taken: Ralph D. Clifford—Yes, Jeanne K. <br /> Krieger—Yes, Martha C. Wood —Yes, Norman P. Cohen —Yes and Nyles N. Barnert—Yes). <br /> A Board Member, Nyles N. Barnert, stated a lot of the things mentioned in the abutter letter are <br /> not under the parameters of the Board of Appeals. <br /> The Board agreed on hours of lighting to be dusk to 9 pm. <br /> Chair, Ralph D. Clifford, stated although they don't have precedence, they are telling other <br /> businesses they can do similar projects. The back of the building is ugly and this painted sign is <br /> less ugly. <br /> Associate member, Michal Boudett, stated although the mural is large it is meant to blend in <br /> with the wall. <br /> The Board of appeals voted five (5) in favor, zero (0) opposed, and zero (0) in abstention to <br /> grant a waiver request for a certified plot plan (a role call was taken: Ralph D. Clifford—Yes, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.