Laserfiche WebLink
09/29/2021 AC Minutes <br /> • The model has some similarities to Tax Increment Financing, which establishes funding <br /> over a period of time. <br /> • What if funds are collected for a project that gets delayed significantly? <br /> • This model means that the impact of the debt exclusion for a large project would be reduced, <br /> which would be positive for the taxpayer. Because a debt exclusion ballot question does not <br /> carry a dollar amount, an educational effort would be important to ensure residents <br /> understand this benefit. <br /> In response to questions, Ms. Kosnoff reported that the Town's actuary is meeting with the <br /> Retirement Board tomorrow, and she expects that new funding options will be presented. The <br /> previous expectation that the pension would be fully funded before bonding for a new high school <br /> would be necessary is no longer likely. <br /> Preparation of the Committee Report to Special Town Meeting (STM) 2021-1 <br /> Mr. Parker reported that he had prepared a chart identifying suggested committee members' <br /> assignments for the report. Ms. Kosnoff provided initial information about the articles on the draft <br /> warrant for the STM 2021-1, as follows: <br /> • Article 2: Appropriate for Prior Years' Unpaid Bills: This will likely be indefinitely <br /> postponed (IP'd). <br /> • Article 3: Establish, Dissolve and Appropriate to and from Specified Stabilization Funds: <br /> There will likely be requests to put funds into two stabilization funds, including $1.0 to $1.5 <br /> million in new growth that was in excess of projections into the CSF, as discussed earlier, as <br /> well as roughly $20,000 in new growth from in-process projects that required approval at <br /> town meetings. Ms. Kosnoff agreed to discuss with Jim Malloy, Town Manager, the <br /> importance of publicizing this model prior to the STM. It was agreed that this Committee's <br /> report would be one venue towards this effort. <br /> There will also be a transfer into the Transportation Demand Management(TDM) <br /> Stabilization Fund. Ms. Kosnoff added that, because TDM funds are received annually, staff <br /> is exploring the possibility of automating these transfers. She added that Lexington had <br /> received a $200,000 grant for transportation operating expenses. These funds cannot go <br /> directly into the TDM Stabilization Fund, but if they are used for operating the Lexpress <br /> system, the equivalent part of the usual tax levy appropriation for Lexpress could be <br /> appropriated into the stabilization fund. <br /> • Article 4: Rescind Prior Borrowing Authorizations: This is currently a placeholder. It is <br /> likely that this routine request will be postponed until the annual town meeting. <br /> • Article 5: Amend FY2021 Operating and Enterprise Budgets: The Town Manager is <br /> requesting funds to hire a management analyst, which would be funded through the tax levy, <br /> using some of the new growth. New staff positions are usually submitted at the annual town <br /> meeting (ATM)through the Program Improvement Request(PIR)process for the coming <br /> fiscal year, but it is preferable for this person to start in January 2022. This position would <br /> be in addition to a management fellow's position, a training program that runs for two-year <br /> increments. Ms. Kosnoff agreed to inform the Town Manager that this Committee would <br /> like a PIR or comparable documentation identifying financial impacts,justification, <br /> alternatives considered, and a job description. <br /> 2 <br />