Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes for Tree Committee (TC) Meeting (via Zoom) on August 12, 2021 <br /> The meeting began at 7:35 am. Attending: Gerry Paul, Nancy Sofen, Mark Sandeen, <br /> Mark Connor, Marc Valenti (DPW), Dave Pinsonneault (DPW), Pat Moyer, Marty <br /> Kvaal, Gloria Bloom (acting secretary), and Charlie Wyman (observer). <br /> Marc V. reported that the tree inventory is due to be completed by Nov-Dec. 2500 trees <br /> have already been inventoried. There is a need to replace some trees on the Battle <br /> Green. Proposed species will be available for the next meeting. <br /> They are working on integrating Article 33 requirements with the Viewpoint Cloud data <br /> base. Nancy requested that a draft of the data to be collected in Viewpoint be sent to the <br /> TC before it is finalized. Nancy volunteered to send a summary of rules, in the new by <br /> law update, that could be given to builders. Gerry asked if some TC members could sit <br /> in on an IT meeting regarding implementing the Viewpoint database. Dave will look <br /> into it. He said the TC is supposed to work thru the DPW. <br /> Chris will meet with developers before the next TC meeting to explain bylaw <br /> requirements and enforcement procedures. We know who the builders are through <br /> permits and a small group does most of the building. Mark Connor said that the bylaw <br /> should be enforced now. Marc V. said that it is being implemented now. <br /> Dave said a new position to help Chris is in the budget. Support of the TC when the <br /> item comes before the Select Board would be useful. <br /> Regarding questions in Nancy's email to Dave (see attachment 4) <br /> Chris is revisiting all sites with open permits. <br /> Builders are being told about additional fees/credits for trees 24" or greater. <br /> Regarding 19 Locke Lane: Chris will check each site before a CO is issued as of now. <br /> He will check all credits/charges at that time. We can't go back to properties that <br /> already have a CO. <br /> For next ATM, Dave suggested that we would have to strengthen the bylaw about <br /> protecting existing trees in order to get builders to take it seriously. Under current <br /> bylaw, the town can hire a professional arborist, to be paid by the builder, to ensure the <br /> health of protected trees. Marc V. noted that we need a real time solution to protect the <br /> trees before the damage is done. The Hancock Street site is a good example of <br /> inadequate protection. It was suggested that we notify Marc or Chris if we see any <br /> violations. Chris will check 8 Eliot Road today. If a builder claims a tree is a hazard <br /> and takes it down before inspection, they will have to provide documentation. A <br /> solution is to require a picture of the tree in the Viewpoint Cloud. Marc said the new <br /> protocol requires a site visit even if the builder says no tree will be taken down. Another <br />