Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2009-11-05-COD-ltr <br />From:michael martignetti <mmartignetti@rcn.com> <br />Sent:Thursday, November 05, 2009 9:36 AM <br />To:Linda Vine; 'Jennifer Williams'; 'Cusack, Susan' <br />Cc:'Garry Rhodes'; vbuckley@rcn.com; 'Janet Perry'; 'Hank Manz'; <br />'Francine <br />Stieglitz'; 'Leonard Morse-Fortier'; 'Charles Burt Cole'; 'julie miller'; <br />'Janice <br />Cyr' <br />Subject:Three Matters To Discus <br />Hi Linda, <br />Hi Linda, <br />Following are a few issues that need discussion amongst the COD and your <br />assistance: <br />1. New Inventory of ADA Compliance in Lexington: <br />a. Jennifer Williams and I have volunteered to bring the ADA Inventory into <br />the 21st Century - meaning <br />online with photos. As we have been reviewing the current data we realize <br />that it is a job that is much <br />bigger than we can handle. Essentially we need to start over (using the <br />current inventory as a <br />guide) recording which projects have already been or are yet to be completed. <br />Some of the buildings <br />that were on the inventory either don't exist (DPW) or are slated for major <br />renovations (the White <br />House & East Lexington Library). <br />b. We would like to know if we could use a portion of the annual $50K that is <br />allotted in the town <br />budget for accessibility matters towards hiring a professional to assist us <br />with updating the ADA <br />Inventory. If that is not possible is there someone already on staff that we <br />could tutor in ADA <br />compliance and they could assist us, lastly, perhaps students could assist as <br />part of their community <br />service responsibility? <br />2. Asking the Board of Assessor's what their position on exemption from auto <br />excise tax is: <br />a. There is an inconsistency in how the Dept. of Revenue (DOR) interprets the <br />same law that exempts <br />qualifying individuals with disabilities from exemption from auto sales tax <br />and auto excise tax. <br />b. The same law applies to both MGL Chapter 60A Section 1 <br />http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/60a- <br />1.htm and the same form needs to be submitted for both - Form MVU 33 - <br />http://www.mass.gov/Ador/docs/dor/Forms/MVU/PDFs/mvu_33.pdf . <br />c. The confusion is over the section of the law that states that - " The <br />excise imposed by this section shall <br />not apply to a motor vehicle owned and registered by a veteran, ... nor to a <br />motor vehicle owned and <br />registered to any person who has suffered loss, or permanent loss of use of, <br />both legs or both arms; nor <br />to a motor vehicle owned and registered to any person who has suffered <br />permanent impairment of <br />vision of both eyes of the following <br />status: central visual acuity of 20/200 or less in the better eye, with <br />corrective glasses, or central visual <br />acuity of more than 20/200 if there is a field defect in which the peripheral <br />field has contracted to such <br />an extent that the widest diameter of visual field subtends an angular <br />distance no greater than twenty <br />Page 1 <br /> <br />