Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> TOWN OF LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS <br />CONSERVATION COMMISSION <br />MINUTES <br />Tuesday, July 1, 2014 <br />6:30 P.M. <br />Parker Room, Town Office Building <br />1625 Massachusetts Avenue <br /> <br /> <br />Chair Joyce Miller opened the meeting at 6:40 pm in the Parker Room of the Town Office <br />Building. <br /> <br />Commissioners Present: Joyce Miller (arrived at 6:39 pm), David Langseth, Dick Wolk (arrived <br />at 6:39 pm), Jane Warren and Duke Bitsko <br /> <br />Commissioners Absent: Stew Kennedy and Phil Hamilton <br /> <br />Others Present: Michelle Morelli, Community Development Department Assistant <br /> <br />PENDING MATTERS <br /> <br />6:40 pm Plan change: 149 Adams Street, DEP# 201-922, BL 882, underground propane <br />tank installation <br />Steve Cavallo, Lexington Development was present for this discussion. He gave <br />a description of digging 5’ into the 100’ wetland buffer zone in order to install an <br />underground propane tank. Mr. Cavallo explained two options for locations of <br />the propane tank. Option #1 would require the least amount of trenching and a <br />fill port will be 6” above grade for a truck hose hook up. Mr. Langseth asked if <br />erosion controls were proposed. Mr. Cavallo replied there are existing erosion <br />controls on site. Mr. Langseth commented the stockpiling be covered or erosion <br />control placed in the area of work. <br /> <br />Motion made and seconded to approve the plan change as described on the plan <br />with option #1, 5-0 in favor. <br /> <br />6:46 pm Update on non-compliance and extension of Order of Conditions: 9 Tufts Road, <br />DEP# 201-835, BL 793 <br /> Mr. Langseth commented the infiltrator unit should either be re-constructed to its <br />original capacity or re-located to the front yard. Mr. Langseth stated that <br />performance standards would not be met if the system is left in its existing <br />location and the non-conforming portions of the project previously required <br />mitigation. Mr. Langseth suggested submittal of a detailed analysis for the <br />system in order to support it functioning properly. The Commission discussed <br />the need for an independent observer. The applicant commented on the design <br />change due to conditions in the field. Mr. Wolk asked for a clarification on the <br />runoff being infiltrated. Mr. Langseth stated there was additional capacity that <br />was reflected in the original design. The applicant will come back in front of the <br />Commission at a later date with a proposal for additional chambers. <br /> <br /> <br />