Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF OCTOBER 1, 2014 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in the Selectmen’s Meeting Room, was <br />called to order at 6:39 p.m. by Chairman Charles Hornig, with members Nancy Corcoran- <br />Ronchetti, Richard Canale, Timothy Dunn, Ginna Johnson, and planning staff Maryann McCall- <br />Taylor Aaron Henry and Lori Kaufman present. <br /> <br />At 6:39 p.m., on a motion duly made and seconded, by a roll call vote of the Board – Mr. Hornig, <br />Ms. Corcoran-Ronchetti, Mr. Canale, Mr. Dunn and Ms. Johnson – it was voted 5-0 to go into <br />executive session for the purpose of discussing the potential litigation regarding the Lexington <br />Hills subdivision and to return to public session. Further, the Chairman declared that an open <br />meeting discussion may have detrimental effect on the litigating position of the Town. <br /> <br />At 7:07 p.m. the Board returned to public session <br /> <br />**********************DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION*********************** <br />83 Spring Street, Site Sensitive Sketch Plan <br />: <br />The applicant has requested that the Board move the sketch plan discussion to the next meeting <br />on October 15 at 7:00 p.m. in the Selectmen’s Meeting Room. <br /> <br />7 Colony Road, Preliminary Subdivision Plan (street construction): <br />Present were Patricia Nelson, attorney, James and Shirine Anderson, applicants, and Mike <br />Kosmos, engineer. The Zoning Board of Appeals granted a variance from the zoning <br />requirements for lot frontage and now must go before the Planning Board to waive the <br />development regulation frontage requirements through the subdivision process. This process will <br />create the new lots and the key issue would be the adequacy of the way. Mr. Kosmos presented <br />the plan and a list of requested waivers in connection with the road improvement plan. <br />Board Comments and Concerns: <br /> <br /> <br /> There would need to be assurance that no trees would be lost with the construction trucks <br />and guarantee tree protection and replacement if trees were lost. <br /> <br /> Cape Cod berm would cause less disturbance to the site and less tree damage so that <br />maybe considered by the Board. <br /> <br />