Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF AUGUST 20, 2014 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in the Selectmen’s Meeting Room, was <br />called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chairman Charles Hornig, with members Nancy Corcoran- <br />Ronchetti, Richard Canale, Timothy Dunn, Ginna Johnson, and planning staff Maryann McCall- <br />Taylor and Aaron Henry present. <br /> <br />At 6:30 p.m., on a motion duly made and seconded, by a roll call vote of the Board – Mr. Hornig, <br />Ms. Corcoran-Ronchetti, Mr. Canale, Mr. Dunn and Ms. Johnson – it was voted 5-0 to go into <br />executive session for the purpose of discussing the potential litigation regarding the Lexington <br />Hills subdivision and to return to public session. <br /> <br />At 7:04 p.m. the Board returned to public session <br /> <br />**********************DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION*********************** <br />48 Summit Road Continued Public Hearing – The Board had received a request to withdraw <br />without prejudice the application for a site sensitive development at 48 Summit Road. On a <br />motion duly made and seconded, the Board voted 5-0 to accept the withdrawal of the application <br />without prejudice. <br /> <br />Lexington Hills Public Hearing, Modification of Special Permit – Representing the Lexington <br />Hills development were attorney Donald Bornstein, Joe Casey and Habib Aminipour. Mr. <br />Borenstein presented the changes they were requesting in the special permit. They would like to <br />raise the impervious surface limit, remove the public access easements and a few other items he <br />considered a minor clean up. <br /> <br />The Board asked what efforts had been made to obtain permission to put a path along Walnut <br />Street and could documentation of that activity be provided? In general the Board supported <br />retaining the easements, which are already on file at the Registry, from the subdivision roads to <br />the public lands surrounding the development. <br /> <br />In order to allow an increase in the impervious surface, the Board wanted assurances that the <br />drainage system could deal with the increased stormwater. The applicant had supplied a letter to <br /> <br />