Laserfiche WebLink
Breadcrumb Navigation:
Page 2 Minutes for the Meeting of July 2, 2014 <br /> <br /> In 2008 there was concern about the existing road that needed to be improved and would <br />require a turnaround at the end. Mr. Russell said the proposed driveway would serve as a <br />T turnaround. Show it as an easement and make sure it could handle the fire truck. <br /> <br /> Confirm the length of the road. <br /> <br /> Would the rip rap be sufficient to handle runoff from Summit Road and prevent water <br />from flowing on to abutters properties? Mr. Russell said it conformed to town standards. <br /> <br /> How would utility services get to the houses? That would be address in the new <br />submission. <br /> <br /> A utility pole was missing that was being held up by a 22 foot oak that was being <br />removed be sure to resolve the utility problems. <br /> <br /> Want to see more options shown for this configuration, show which drive goes to which <br />house and provide more clarity. <br /> <br /> No swales were shown and it looked like the runoff would go into the abutter’s swales <br />and onto those properties. Mr. Russell said the water flow off site would be reduced with <br />the infiltration structures. <br /> <br /> Provide an operations and maintenance plan. <br /> <br /> Reduce the amount of pavement and would pervious pavers be used. This proposed plan <br />was designed for the for the maximum, but could be less with a two-car garage house <br />instead of three, but could not agree to only a two-car garage house or using pervious <br />pavers. <br /> <br /> The grading very close to large trees and sacrificing their roots and stability. Would have <br />a landscape architect look at that. <br /> <br />th <br /> Staff memo dated June 24 had some concerns. Mr. Russell addressed the concerns <br />raised in the letter. <br /> <br /> What would be the calculations for material brought in and out of the site? Those <br />calculations would be provided next time. <br /> <br /> Would the little wall in front of the existing house be relocated? The wall would be kept <br />just pushed back. <br /> <br /> What would be the approach for pedestrian path and bikeway? <br /> <br /> Tie down the location of the house considering the existing natural features, soil <br />conditions, vegetation and ledge and minimize the disturbance to the site. Would want to <br />put the house as high as possible to minimize blasting of ledge. <br /> <br /> Reclaim and replace pavement and show turning templates and easements. <br /> <br />