Laserfiche WebLink
income index assets as of 3131113. Read Burns mentioned SSgA has ETF floating rate products <br />where duration risk is removed. SSgA's investment philosophy, index investment process and <br />risk management were discussed. <br />Mike suggested transferring the SSgA investment to Loomis Sayles and Alan stated he would like <br />to wait until after the representatives from PRIT attend the Sept. meeting to consider where the <br />2% invested with SSga could be placed. Bob mentioned using it as a funding source when there <br />is a shortage. <br />After discussing the involuntary ADR application received, Bob made a motion to request <br />PERAC set up a medical panel. The motion was seconded by Rob and approved unanimously. <br />The Vanguard balance as of 6130113 was $3,069,273. The Town invested an additional $775,000 <br />in July. <br />A motion was made by Bob, seconded by Joe and approved unanimously to have Monroe and all <br />investment companies use "Lexington Retirement System" on all documents. <br />The Board was given a copy of PERAC memo 918 regarding mandatory Board training. The <br />Board requested that educational credit balances be checked before next meeting. <br />The PERAC auditors will be coming in September for a three -year audit. <br />The Administrator's review was to be discussed. <br />A motion was made, seconded and approved unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 10:30. <br />The next meeting will be held August 21, 2013, 8:00 AM at Cary Memorial Library in the large <br />meeting room. <br />On July 29", the Lexington Retirement System provided the Selectman with an update on the <br />performance of the Retirement System. Chairman. Bob Cunha introduced Alan Fields and Mike <br />McNabb representatives of the Trustees to make the presentation. The attached three charts <br />highlight the in�or points that the trustees wanted to share. <br />Chart l .....the funding ratio of the plan (78.3%) represented the second highest ratio level for all <br />towns in the Commonwealth. <br />Chart 2..... the performance results of the plan durin g the past ten years and over shorter <br />intervals was in line with a 60140 global benchmark (equity/debt) but trailed the aetuarial target <br />over five and ten year time frames reflecting the sub par results of financial market returns. <br />Chart 3... -the Trustees offered a comparative chart which highlighted the difference in asset <br />allocation between the Lexington plan and the Commonwealth's PRIT asset allocation. The <br />chart also provided a cash flow analysis which explained that the difference in equity exposure <br />and illiquid real estate and private equity investments reflected the unique liquidity eds of the <br />Lexington plan. <br />