Laserfiche WebLink
Karen Mullins Page 2 February 19, 2013 <br /> Summary of Facts and opinions: <br /> (a) Owner: Trustees of the Supreme Council of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite of <br /> Freemasonry <br /> (b) Original and Amended Date of Valuation: October 2, 2012 <br /> (c) Original Highest and Best Use: Existing instructional building and 8 residential house <br /> lots; Amended Highest and Best Use: Existing instructional building and 9 residential <br /> house lots <br /> (d) Amended Estimate of Value: $8,200,000 <br /> Summaa of Original Appraisal: <br /> On December 3, 2012 we completed an appraisal report of the above referenced property with an <br /> effective date of value of October 2, 2012. The value reported in the original appraisal is as <br /> follows: <br /> SEVEN MILLION SIX HUNDRED SEVENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS <br /> $7,670,000 <br /> Changes from the original to new appraisal conclusions: <br /> The original appraisal report was based on a land area of 10.3+/- acres. A small parcel of land <br /> known as the `pine grove' has been removed from the subject property, bringing the area <br /> appraised to 9.98 acres. The parcel's frontage is unaffected. The pine grove area consists of level <br /> ground with a small stand of pine trees and driveways to the front and rear of the principal <br /> improvements. In the original report, it was assumed that the parcel would have access via and <br /> easement over other land controlled by the owner to these driveways. Access over these <br /> driveways is similarly assumed. <br /> The value conclusion in the original appraisal report was based on a conceptual development <br /> study prepared by GCG Associates, Inc. which showed the improved lot and 8 potential <br /> residential building lots. GCG has revised this plan to show that 9 residential house lots are <br /> possible with the elimination of a detention pond. The length of road required to construct the <br /> cul-de-sac shown is unchanged. The lot areas, including the area associated with the institutional <br /> building changed slightly, but none of the changes had a material effect on the value of the <br /> various lots. The Lexington Planning Department has deemed this revision of the plan to be <br /> reasonable. <br /> The <br /> Real Estate Appraisal and Consulting <br /> ]Foster <br /> Company <br />