|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2013 PB Rpt to ATM -Art 34
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
ELECTIONS AND TOWN MEETING ACTION & WARRANTS
>
Town Meeting Minutes and Reports
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
Reports
>
2013 PB Rpt to ATM -Art 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2019 3:57:02 PM
Creation date
3/11/2014 5:10:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Town of Lexington <br /> „ m PLANNING BOARD <br /> APk6:L F}4w <br /> Richard L. Canale,Chair 1625 Massachusetts Avenue <br /> Gregory Zurlo,Vice Chair Lexington,MA 02420 <br /> Michelle Ciccolo,Clerk Tel(781) 862-0500 Ext.245 <br /> Charles Hornig Facsimile(781)861-2748 <br /> Nancy Corcoran-Ronchetti planningglexingtonma.gov <br /> PLANNING BOARD REPORT TO THE 2013 ANNUAL TOWN MEETING <br /> ARTICLE 34 AMENDMENT TO ZONING BYLAW <br /> .RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE <br /> .SUMMARY <br /> It has been over 30 years since a comprehensive review of the Zoning Bylaw (ZBL)has been <br /> undertaken. The current initiative has three broad objectives: <br /> 1. Resolve irregularities with state and case law; <br /> 2. Address internal inconsistencies within the Zoning Bylaw; and <br /> 3. Recodify and streamline the Zoning Bylaw to improve its readability. <br /> There have been several significant and binding court decisions over the last few years that <br /> require corrective action. The date-based standards in the current bylaw run afoul of the <br /> Uniformity Clause of the Zoning Act, a requirement that the rules be the same for each parcel in <br /> a zoning district. There have been decisions by the courts regarding pre-existing nonconforming <br /> properties which are incompatible with our rules. The courts have also struck down zoning that <br /> requires special permits for by-right subdivisions. <br /> Turning to the internal inconsistencies within the Bylaw, several sections of the current Bylaw <br /> (and Map)have been identified as no longer necessary. The RM district claims to be a multi- <br /> family district but does not allow multi-family development, and so no longer serves any <br /> purpose. The Wetland Protection District was established when the only other option to preserve <br /> wetlands was town acquisition of the wetlands and surrounding land area. The establishment of <br /> state and local wetland and stormwater bylaws makes this approach unnecessary as they provide <br /> better and stronger tools to protect our wetlands. <br /> Finally, we hope to improve the Bylaw's readability by reformatting it. This should help users of <br /> the Bylaw navigate the document, and in concert with the other changes, makes the document <br /> more understandable. These changes include the removal of reiterations and repetitions of <br /> procedures (most of which are being moved to the various Boards' regulations), removal of <br /> sections that simply restate state law, deletion of the "purpose of the districts" section (as the <br /> March 13, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.