Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF JANUARY 8, 2014 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in the Selectmen’s Meeting Room, was <br />called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Chairman Charles Hornig with members Richard Canale, Michelle <br />Ciccolo, Greg Zurlo and Nancy Corcoran-Ronchetti and planning staff Maryann McCall-Taylor, <br />Aaron Henry, and Lori Kaufman present. <br /> <br />************************DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION********************* <br />111-119 Laconia Street, Sketch Plan: <br /> <br />Bill Eycleshymer and Michael Walsh, applicants, Mike Novak, project manager and Jeff Thoma, <br />landscape architect, were present at the meeting. Mr. Novak said the site showed a proof plan of <br />two lots and the two existing dwellings would be demolished. The proposed plan would be a <br />balanced housing development (BHD) with four units on the site. The back of the lot would have <br />32,000 square feet for common open space, additional screening would be added to the sides to <br />buffer the view for abutters, the setbacks would be consistent with neighboring homes, there <br />would be three curb cuts, one wide drive for two houses and one drive each for the other two <br />units. The wetlands delineation was fairly new and considered accurate by Karen Mullins from <br />the Conservation Department. The applicant believed the BHD would provide housing diversity. <br />Board Comments: <br /> <br /> <br /> There was concern about changing the existing streetscape on either side of the site for <br />the abutters. <br /> <br /> Three units would make more sense. <br /> <br /> Provide a 3D computer modeling and include the adjacent homes. <br /> <br /> The side houses would be too close to the neighbors. <br /> <br /> Not comfortable with the two houses in the rear and two in front. <br /> <br /> The open space proposed would have slopes and wetlands; it should be useable open <br />space. <br /> <br /> Why was only one plan proposed and why not do two teardowns? Would a conventional <br />plan be considered? Mr. Novak said a conventional plan would make no sense <br />economically. <br /> <br /> There were questions that would need to be addressed by the Conservation Commission <br />before going any further. <br /> <br />