Laserfiche WebLink
brought proponents of the three proposals "to the table," literally, to discuss possible site <br />placement /scope of each one in relation to the other, if the land were to serve multi purposes, <br />i.e., affordable housing, a community farm, and a recreation field, while conducting a "site <br />trace" (laying over on the site survey representations -to -scale of key proposal elements in <br />various configurations }; began to discuss the elements and format (categories) of our final <br />report to the BOS; assigned two BLUPC members each to evaluate one of the three proposals <br />according to the evaluation criteria and to bring what they wrote to the next meeting; agreed to <br />meet at least twice in February, after the scheduled January 19th meeting. <br />• January 10, 2011: presented progress report to the Board of Selectmen <br />• January 19, 2011: reviewed meeting with the Board of Selectmen on January 10, 2011; shared <br />and reviewed draft evaluations of the three proposals; developed an outline for the final report <br />• February 2, 2011: heard from committee members regarding their thoughts about the reuse of <br />the Busa land; shared and reviewed drafts of material for the final report <br />• February 9, 2011: reviewed drafts of material for the final report; reviewed how the report will <br />be organized, printed, assembled, and distributed; learned that the committee will present the <br />final report at the March 14, 2011 meeting of the Board of Selectmen <br />• February 16, 2011: discussed possible number of affordable housing units; continued to review <br />drafts of material for the final report; reviewed format and organization of the report <br />• February 28, 2011: final review and edit of the draft of the final report <br />• March 14, 2011: presented final report of the BLUPC to the Board of Selectmen; anticipate that <br />future meetings with the selectmen will be scheduled to review the details of the report <br />3.2 Evaluation Criteria for Land Use Proposals <br />1. The value /benefit to the people of Lexington <br />2. How many people benefit from the use; benefit to underserved populations <br />3. Scale of the proposed land use /development <br />4. Impact to the neighborhood <br />5. Impact to abutters and enhancements <br />6. Impact to the Arlington Reservoir and enhancements <br />7. Impact to environmental resource areas and enhancements <br />8. Impact to public utilities and infrastructure and enhancements <br />9. Security requirements <br />10. Maintenance requirements <br />11. Financial impact to the Town (cost and benefit) <br />12. Consistency with Town Master Plan and Core Values <br />13. Sustainability <br />14. Timeline <br />Busa Land Use Proposal Committee Report <br />Page 15 / 52 <br />