Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Lexington Capital Expenditures Committee (CEC) Meeting <br />March 6, 2013, Executive Session <br />Date, Place, and Location: March 6, 2013, 5:00 A.M., Cary Memorial Building, Ellen Stone <br />Room <br />Members Present: Charles Lamb, Chair; Beth Masterman, Vice - Chair; Jill Hai; Bill Hurley; <br />David Kanter <br />Documents Presented: None <br />With Mr. Lamb, as Chair, having called to order at 8:02 A. M. the Open Session — which had <br />been posted also to involve an Executive Session —he subsequently declared that an <br />Executive Session was warranted under the Open Meeting Law Exemption 6 (to consider <br />the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property) as the discussion in an open <br />meeting may have a detrimental effect on the negotiating position of the Town —and with <br />the intention to reconvene in Open Session. A Motion to do so was made and seconded. <br />Each member was polled and each voted "yes" The Committee went into Executive <br />Session at 8:03 A.M. <br />Potential Acquisition of Property at 33 Marrett Road <br />Mr. Kanter briefed the Committee on what he had noted as having occurred at the <br />Executive Session of the Community Preservation Committee (CPC) held the previous <br />afternoon. <br />That Session had also been called under the same Exemption, and for the same <br />purpose, as this Session. <br />Rob Addelson, Assistant Town Manager for Finance, had presented information on <br />the portion of the purchase price being offered to the seller that was considered eligible for <br />funding under the Community Preservation Act (CPA) and proposed the CPC should <br />recommend to Town Meeting appropriating all of that portion from the Community <br />Preservation Fund (CPF). <br />He explained to the CPC that, even using very conservative assumptions, his model <br />for the status of the CPF, starting with FY2014 and running out until FY2021, reflected that <br />the CPF cover all the known and major claims while still having yearly allocations for future <br />projects not currently known. (Mr. Kanter commented that model didn't run out until even <br />the end of the first contemplated 10 -year bond.) Mr. Addelson also pointed out that his <br />model didn't include the elimination of current claims that might be Indefinitely Postponed at <br />the upcoming Annual Town Meeting (e.g., CPF funding for the Visitors Center Project) and <br />relief from previous claims (e.g., the Project to upgrade the current Senior Center at the <br />Muzzey Condominiums). <br />The CPC discussed the basis for proposed portion of the purchase price relative to <br />the higher of the two appraisals of the property —which is the one being used as the legal <br />cap on how much the CPF can provide for a land purchase. <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />