2013-01-22-CEC-min-exec - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Minutes of the Lexington Capital Expenditures Committee (CEC) Meeting January 22, 2013, Executive Session Date, Place, and Location: January 22, 2013, 8:00 A.M., Town Office Building, Reed Room (111) Members Present: Charles Lamb, Chair; Beth Masterman, Vice - Chair; Jill Hai; Bill Hurley; David Kanter Other Attendee(s): Deborah Mauger, Chair, Board of Selectmen, Carl Valente, Town Manager; Sara Arnold, Recording Secretary Documents Presented: None With Mr. Lamb having called to order at 8:33 A.M. the Open Session —which had been posted also to involve an Executive Session —he then declared, as Chair, that an Executive Session was warranted under the Open Meeting Law Exemption 6 (to consider the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property) as the discussion in an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the negotiating position of the Town —and with the intention to reconvene in Open Session. A Motion to do so was made and seconded. Each member was polled and each voted "yes" The Committee went into Executive Session at 8:34 A.M. Potential Acquisition of Property at 33 Marrett Road Mr. Lamb reviewed for Ms. Mauger and Mr. Valente the Committee's concerns that had been identified at its December 18, 2012 meeting regarding the Town's potential purchase. • The potential acquisition of this property seems to have heightened the competition for financial resources for capital projects, and the potential projects do not appear to be prioritized; • The Committee is concerned about public- safety needs and believes they should have priority; • The voters should be afforded an opportunity to express their support for or against major capital projects, such as this purchase; the use of Conservation Preservation Act (CPA) funds shouldn't preclude that process; • There is Committee support for moving forward on Cary Memorial Building renovations, which project impacts available resources; • The Town shouldn't buy the land just to protect it from development. There should be, for the record, an evaluation of real- estate -tax income from homes and the likely services burden to the Town from such a development. Ms. Mauger said that housing generally doesn't pay for itself because it brings in more students who use the schools; and • If the Town uses CPA funds, this could restrict the Town's ability to re -sell the property if the Town should subsequently decide that the purchase was not in the Town's best interest. Ms. Masterman asked if the purchase satisfies a need, or is this just something that is wanted; she believes that there are public- safety needs that should be addressed first. Mr. Lamb reiterated that public safety is the Committee's highest priority. Page 1 of 5