Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> October 8, 2007 <br />Minutes <br />Town of Lexington Appropriation Committee <br />October 8, 2007 <br /> <br />Place and time: Police Station Guard Room, 8:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Members present: Alan Levine (Chair), Rod Cole (Vice Chair), John Bartenstein <br />(Secretary), Deborah Brown, Richard Eurich, Michael Kennealy, Susan McLeish, Eric <br />Michelson, Rob Addelson (ex officio, non-voting) <br /> <br />Also present: Patrick Mehr <br /> <br /> Proposed Shire TIF agreement <br /> 1.. Patrick Mehr raised concerns about the two <br />agreements (200/300 parcels and 400 parcel), in particular a concern whether they <br />provide adequate protection against Shire locating its manufacturing elsewhere in the <br />next year. He posed a question about the consequences under the TIF if Shire doesn’t <br />ultimately develop the manufacturing facility (planned for parcel 400). Rob Addelson <br />responded that the TIF is meant to be an incentive to develop all three parcels, to locate <br />manufacturing here, and to carry out the complete capital investment that Shire has <br />described, although there is no binding language in contract currently. <br /> <br /> Discussion ensued about the specifics of the two agreements. The Committee <br />concluded that the $3.1 million in mitigation payments should be enforceable if either <br />one or both agreements are carried out, otherwise we will have to re-evaluate our position <br />on support/approval. It was agreed to add a paragraph about this in our report. <br /> <br /> Rob Addelson raised an issue about the 400 parcel. In order to create this parcel, <br />the current 400/500 parcel must be subdivided (hence the separate contract). Patriot <br />Partners has just submitted a lot plan that also shows changes to the 200 and 300 parcel <br />lot lines. This is troublesome to Town Counsel in terms of drafting the TIF agreement to <br />make sure there’s appropriate language describing the parcels. This impacts base values <br />and increments, so Rob also wants time to review the implications with the Assessor. He <br />said that Town Meeting may be asked to approve the fundamental terms and conditions <br />of the agreement and authorize the BOS to negotiate and execute a final agreement <br />consistent with the fundamental terms and conditions of the October 10 drafts. <br /> <br /> Deborah expressed reservations about presenting this to Town Meeting in this <br />way, and suggested that there would likely be great resistance to approving the proposal <br />without specific language and a final agreement. She also felt it important to run the <br />scenarios with new base values so the Committee can confirm that the financial <br />projections won’t materially change. Others shared these concerns and Rob agreed to <br />communicate these concerns to the negotiating team. <br /> <br />Voting on Articles <br /> 2. . Susan added her votes to Articles 2, 3, 4, 5 making all <br />votes 9-0. <br /> <br /> - 1 - <br /> <br />