Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> January 11, 2007 <br />Minutes <br />Town of Lexington Appropriation Committee <br />January 11, 2007 <br /> <br /> <br />Place and time: Legion Room, Cary Memorial Building, 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Members present: Al Levine (Chair), Deborah Brown (Vice-Chair), John Bartenstein <br />(Secretary), Rod Cole, Rick Eurich, Pam Hoffman, David Kanter, Mike Kennealy, Eric <br />Michelson, Rob Addelson (ex officio, non-voting) <br /> <br />Also present: Michael Young, Budget Officer; Gloria Bloom, TMMA Chair; George <br />Burnell <br /> <br />The meeting was called to order at 7:40 PM. <br /> <br /> FY08 Budget Status. <br />1. Michael Young distributed a current working draft of <br />the Fiscal Year 2008 Manager’s Recommended Budget & Financing Plan (the “White <br />Book”), dated January 8, 2007, together with a Powerpoint presentation on the FY08 <br />budget that had been made to the Board of Selectmen at its most recent meeting on <br />Monday, January 8. Michael and Rob Addelson then reviewed the highlights of the <br />Town Manager’s working budget plan with the Committee. They emphasized that this <br />version of the budget plan did not yet have the input of the School Department, but <br />otherwise was reasonably complete. <br /> <br />Michael explained that the School Superintendent would be presenting his <br />operating budget to the School Committee on Tuesday, January 16. The school numbers <br />would then be added to the municipal numbers to determine the complete combined <br />projected operating budget and the projected budget gap. The third Summit meeting, <br />scheduled for Thursday, January 18 would address the allocation of the FY07 to FY08 <br />revenue increase between municipal and school expenses, and the Town Manager hoped <br />to be able to present a final budget to the Board of Selectmen on Monday, January 22. <br /> <br />Some of the key points made concerning the FY2008 projected budget were as <br />follows: <br /> <br />?? <br />State aid increased last year to an amount close to its historic high in dollar <br />terms, and the level for FY2008 is not expected to go down, but state aid still <br />is significantly below the level that would have been expected had historical <br />amounts increased with inflation. <br /> <br />?? <br />Recent changes in the composition of the Cherry Sheet require an accounting <br />adjustment in order to make historical comparisons; in particular, since FY06, <br />state payments for the METCO program have been made as a direct grant and <br />are no longer on the Cherry Sheet; the numbers in the White Book for FY06 <br />have been restated to account for this change. <br /> <br /> - 1 - <br /> <br />