Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> April 27, 2005 <br />Minutes <br />Town of Lexington Appropriation Committee <br />April 27, 2005 <br /> <br /> <br />Place and time: Cary Memorial Hall, Estabrook Hall, 6:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Members present: Al Levine, Deborah Brown, Rick Eurich, Rod Cole, David Kanter, <br />Ron Pawliczek, Eric Michelson, John Bartenstein <br /> <br />This meeting of the Appropriation Committee was held in conjunction with Budget <br />Collaboration Group Meeting VII, which was convened primarily to discuss <br />supplemental appropriations under Article 29 and school capital issues under Articles 30 <br />and 31. <br /> <br /> Liberty Ride <br />1.. Board of Selectmen Chair Jeanne Krieger advised that a motion <br />would be made at that evening’s Town Meeting to amend Article 37, Line 7300 <br />(Economic Development) to eliminate reauthorization of the Liberty Ride Program <br />Revolving Fund. Although the Liberty Ride has historically operated on a break-even <br />basis by the end of the fiscal year, (residual deficits having been made up by <br />contributions), it has not historically been able to operate on a pay-as-you-go basis <br />throughout the year. As amended, the anticipated expenses of the Liberty Ride would be <br />appropriated from the General Fund, to be offset by anticipated receipts. <br /> <br /> Additional Funding for Fiske Construction Project <br />2.. The first issue <br />discussed under Article 29 was the need for a supplemental appropriation to fund cost <br />overruns on the Fiske School construction project. School Facilities Manager Dana Ham <br />reported that bids had been opened earlier in the day. The low bid was $14,245,000 (base <br />bid) plus $655,000 (bid alternates) for a total of $14,900,000. The addition of FF&E, <br />design and soft costs of $3,260,000, and a contingency of $750,000, would bring the total <br />estimated project cost to $18,910,000. <br /> <br />Although the final project cost was not as large as had been feared given recent <br />severe inflationary trends in the construction industry, Dana reported that it still would <br />exceed the $17,600,000 remaining under the Harrington/Fiske debt exclusion override by <br />about $1,300,000, which is approximately 4% of the original $32,150,000 debt exclusion <br />adopted in 2002. Therefore, the Schools would need authorization to borrow this <br />additional amount in order to accept the bid. <br /> <br />There ensued an extensive discussion about how best to handle the anticipated <br />cost overrun. Options discussed included: (1) seeking authorization from the Department <br />of Revenue to borrow the additional amount under the outstanding debt exclusion <br />override (DOR policy permits a one-time addition of “a modest amount attributable to <br />inflation, new regulatory requirements or minor project changes”); (2) putting out a new <br />debt exclusion override to fund the additional costs; (3) funding the overrun with <br />additional in-levy borrowing; or (4) cutting project costs. <br /> - 1 - <br /> <br />